Calipari ejected

[zm1283]

Kentucky is at South Carolina. 17:34 in the first half. South Carolina called for a foul on a rebound. Camera cuts away, Calipari gets one technical then goes to the table to confront the official about it and gets a second one....bye bye. Something happened between him and that official while the other official was reporting the original foul, but you can't really tell from what they showed. If the video experts can pull it up later it would be interesting to see.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by zm1283

Kentucky is at South Carolina. 17:34 in the first half. South Carolina called for a foul on a rebound. Camera cuts away, Calipari gets one technical then goes to the table to confront the official about it and gets a second one....bye bye. Something happened between him and that official while the other official was reporting the original foul, but you can't really tell from what they showed. If the video experts can pull it up later it would be interesting to see.

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

No, it was against South Carolina. It was a rebounding foul.

SC shot 4 because of the 2 technical fouls.

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

No, he is correct. The official called the foul on South Carolina and pointed Kentucky's direction. Why would South Carolina shoot two free throws for a non-bonus foul? They shot four free throws because Calipari got two technical fouls.

Calipari was upset about a previous scrum on a rebound where there was no foul called. If it's the same one ESPN showed, there was no foul as the SC player displaced his teammate and no one from Kentucky.

[Rich]

How many HS officials would've allowed the subsequent action to happen without showing the coach the gate?

This is a great example of a great official doing what he had to do.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

I stand corrected. I see that they did give the ball to kentucky after the 4 FTs for the 2 technicals.

You can CLICK HERE to see a video of it already posted.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Rich

How many HS officials would've allowed the subsequent action to happen without showing the coach the gate?

A lot, unfortunately. And that's partly because some assigners (present company accepted) assume their officials didn't handle something well the moment they get a phone call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rich]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

A lot, unfortunately. And that's partly because some assigners (present company accepted) assume their officials didn't handle something well the moment they get a phone call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I want to see film before I decide for myself.

Consequently, if an official complains to me about a coach and didn't issue a technical in the game, I'm not interested in that report, either.

[Adam]

Let's get back on track, folks. I've just deleted some posts because there's no need to pile on here.

[Rich]

Perhaps his goal wasn't to de-escalate there.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Rich

Perhaps his goal wasn't to de-escalate there.

Yep, may have been too late for that.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Anyone notice Sirmons run across the court to Cal before he gave the T? I can't imagine that is a good way to de-escalate things.

My thoughts exactly. Calipari wasn't looking to get tossed but something was said to him that clearly fired him up.

Originally Posted by Rich

Perhaps his goal wasn't to de-escalate there.

Are you suggesting baiting him is OK? (Put aside your disdain for Calipari and imagine that was your beloved Bo Ryan before you answer).

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

My thoughts exactly. Calipari wasn't looking to get tossed but something was said to him that clearly fired him up.



Are you suggesting baiting him is OK? (Put aside your disdain for Calipari and imagine that was your beloved Bo Ryan before you answer).

Or maybe Sirmons went over that way in response to something Calipari did/said.

Hall of Famer. What a joke. How he got voted in over Bo Ryan still disappoints me.

[jeremy341a]

Who was SC foul on 30, 24 or 25?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by jeremy341a

Who was SC foul on 30, 24 or 25?

The play on the rebounding foul appears to be on white 25 (Ending view)

That was according to the box score I looked up.

Peace