Calipari ejected

[zm1283]

Kentucky is at South Carolina. 17:34 in the first half. South Carolina called for a foul on a rebound. Camera cuts away, Calipari gets one technical then goes to the table to confront the official about it and gets a second one....bye bye. Something happened between him and that official while the other official was reporting the original foul, but you can't really tell from what they showed. If the video experts can pull it up later it would be interesting to see.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by zm1283

Kentucky is at South Carolina. 17:34 in the first half. South Carolina called for a foul on a rebound. Camera cuts away, Calipari gets one technical then goes to the table to confront the official about it and gets a second one....bye bye. Something happened between him and that official while the other official was reporting the original foul, but you can't really tell from what they showed. If the video experts can pull it up later it would be interesting to see.

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

No, it was against South Carolina. It was a rebounding foul.

SC shot 4 because of the 2 technical fouls.

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes

Tom Hart was INCORRECT when he stated that the initial foul was called against South Carolina. It was against Kentucky, which is why SC shot 4 FTs.

I've gotta wonder if this is the quickest Caliper has ever gotten the hook.

No, he is correct. The official called the foul on South Carolina and pointed Kentucky's direction. Why would South Carolina shoot two free throws for a non-bonus foul? They shot four free throws because Calipari got two technical fouls.

Calipari was upset about a previous scrum on a rebound where there was no foul called. If it's the same one ESPN showed, there was no foul as the SC player displaced his teammate and no one from Kentucky.

[Rich]

How many HS officials would've allowed the subsequent action to happen without showing the coach the gate?

This is a great example of a great official doing what he had to do.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

I stand corrected. I see that they did give the ball to kentucky after the 4 FTs for the 2 technicals.

You can CLICK HERE to see a video of it already posted.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Rich

How many HS officials would've allowed the subsequent action to happen without showing the coach the gate?

A lot, unfortunately. And that's partly because some assigners (present company accepted) assume their officials didn't handle something well the moment they get a phone call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rich]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

A lot, unfortunately. And that's partly because some assigners (present company accepted) assume their officials didn't handle something well the moment they get a phone call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I want to see film before I decide for myself.

Consequently, if an official complains to me about a coach and didn't issue a technical in the game, I'm not interested in that report, either.

[twocentsworth]

Kentucky was getting shoved around on their defensive glass...I can see why Calipari go the 1st one....ESPECIALLY after the NCAA's video bulletin emphasized calling fouls during block out/rebounds....

[ODog]

Originally Posted by twocentsworth

Kentucky was getting shoved around on their defensive glass...I can see why Calipari go the 1st one....ESPECIALLY after the NCAA's video bulletin emphasized calling fouls during block out/rebounds....

??

The official literally JUST called that exact thing in Kentucky's favor. Nothing justifies that response from Cal.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by twocentsworth

Kentucky was getting shoved around on their defensive glass...I can see why Calipari go the 1st one....ESPECIALLY after the NCAA's video bulletin emphasized calling fouls during block out/rebounds....

I will post the play in a few minutes.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ODog

??

The official literally JUST called that exact thing in Kentucky's favor. Nothing justifies that response from Cal.

Actually he called a foul against Kentucky. That is why he got upset. But it was a good call. His guy cleared out a SC player.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Peace

[JRutledge]

I am very sure. I can post the entire sequence, but it was already shown. They gave the ball to South Carolina after everything and it was clear that that is what got him upset if you see the entire situation. I am looking for an angle right now they showed that will show why the foul was called.

Peace

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Actually he called a foul against Kentucky. That is why he got upset. But it was a good call. His guy cleared out a SC player.

Peace

No. The foul just before the ejection was on South Carolina. If not, why did Kentucky get possession on the POI after the four free throws? Jamal Murray missed a three five seconds later at 17:29, he is a Kentucky player.

Go here and look at 17:34. Foul on Kacinas, who is a SC player: Kentucky Wildcats vs. South Carolina Gamecocks - Play by Play - February 13, 2016 - ESPN