Running out of bounds and returning

[deecee]

Originally Posted by OfficialBFish

Didn't know NCAA interpretation. Thanks

It's also a violation in HS.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by deecee

It's also a violation in HS.

In HS the violation is for leaving, not touching the ball first after returning.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Rich

In HS the violation is for leaving, not touching the ball first after returning.

Yes, I made an assumption that the OP didn't know that either from his post.

[OfficialBFish]

Originally Posted by Rich

In HS the violation is for leaving, not touching the ball first after returning.

So if the same situation happened in high school, what would be the ruling?

[JRutledge]

Do you have the time of the play in the game?

Peace

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by OfficialBFish

So if the same situation happened in high school, what would be the ruling?

The violation would be whistled when the player steps out of bounds to go around the screen. The official wouldn't wait until he touched the ball after returning.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Do you have the time of the play in the game?

About 2:30 remaining in the second half.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

About 2:30 remaining in the second half.

Peace

Why the heck did Eades go opposite? I checked my NCAA-M manual and didn't see anything about going opposite on this or any other type of violation. He didn't call a technical according to the box score.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OfficialBFish

Does it make any difference that he was the inbounder and never fully seemed to step in bounds after the throw in?

IMO, the thrower clearly steps from out of bounds and is right foot appears to be completely in-bounds and the left foot is in the air for a moment, then he goes out of bounds.

If he had never left the court, then this would be a Class B Technical Foul under Rule 10-4-1k. I think that is not what happened in this case.

Peace

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by OfficialBFish

Does it make any difference that he was the inbounder and never fully seemed to step in bounds after the throw in?

No, his motion off the screen took him further OOB, it was used to his advantage.

Have had a similar discussion before with others, if A2 runs OOB and then comes back in, and AFTER he is back in bounds and established, A1 throws the pass is that a violation? Rule says, " A player who has stepped out of bounds under his own volition and then becomes the first player to touch the ball after returning to the playing court has committed a violation." If the ball is still in A1's hand, then A1 is the first to touch the ball by virtue of the fact that it's still in his hand. So is this a legal play? By the letter of the rule, I think yes, but by the spirit of the rule, I'd say no.

[JetMetFan]

Originally Posted by OfficialBFish

Does it make any difference that he was the inbounder and never fully seemed to step in bounds after the throw in?

Well, if that was the case the player could have received a technical for purposely delaying his return to the playing court after being legally out
of bounds. Given the two choices on the menu, I think the player and his coach would opt for the violation.