Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp
In what world is grabbing an airborne player around both shoulders from behind a legitimate play on the ball? Its not even close.
Easy intentional on the first play that is borderline flagrant as it can be argued that it was "violent" in nature.
And when I assess the flagrant for the kick that was a direct reaction to a dangerous and "violent" play like that, its an equally easy decision to upgrade the first act to flagrant and DQ both IMO.
|
The more I watch the play, the less I see it as a legitimate attempt to play the ball. I'm still not convinced that it's flagrant. Again, the worst of it comes when they hit the wall. I'm closer to flagrant than I was originally...but I'm still not there.