The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
HS Intentional/Flagrant VIDEO

Received this video from our association of a recent play and the expected adjudication (which I had when I first watched the video).

Flagrant/Intentional on the initial foul
then Flagrant/Technical for the kick

__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:07am
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dang. On first watching I had INT on the first foul and regular tech on the second thing but after I've seen it a few times I say toss both of them.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
I really wouldn't have any issue with either intentional or flagrant personal on the first foul.

Kick is definitely a flagrant T.

00's sub will shoot two first, then any white player shoots for the T. White ball at division line.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
I do wish the calling official closed in on the initial contact.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:04pm
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
I do wish the calling official closed in on the initial contact.
Maybe, but I'm not sure that it would've made a difference... and if he had closed down, it would've been harder for him to see the kick.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
I do wish the calling official closed in on the initial contact.
Great point,

Certainly doesn't explain fouled player actions in any way. But if he gets in there quicker maybe kick never happens.
__________________
"The soldier is the army."

-General George S. Patton, Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
So was the expected adjudication Flagrant or Intentional on the personal foul?

I think I would have discussed with partners and probably suggested that both be flagrant. But I would have either they both flagrant or give them both a second chance.

I was surprised at how calm things were after this so maybe this looked worse on video. If the officials felt that the game was still under control with no risk of further issues, I could see going intentional and technical and moving on.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
The initial foul should have been a flagrant, and same for the kick. Both should have gotten the boot.

I believe what was done in the game was INT and T.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 268
Both gentlemen would have had the rest of the game to think about their actions as they were residing on the bench.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:29pm
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by SE Minnestoa Re View Post
Both gentlemen would have had the rest of the game to think about their actions as they were residing on the bench.
Really, how would they be on the bench for the remainder of the game? If you are going flagrant, then they are both going to be sitting in their respective locker rooms, not on the bench.

I am going flagrant on both fouls and I would have gone flagrant on the initial foul even if it wasn't followed by the kick.

I don't have offsetting, it is not a double foul. I am going to administer in order of occurrence.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
Really, how would they be on the bench for the remainder of the game? If you are going flagrant, then they are both going to be sitting in their respective locker rooms, not on the bench.
In high school ball, you are only ejected to your bench, not the locker room, except in extenuating circumstances. And if a player needs to be removed to the locker room, you better make sure that a responsible adult or administrator accompanies them.
__________________
If you ain't first, you're LAST!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 12:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
Really, how would they be on the bench for the remainder of the game? If you are going flagrant, then they are both going to be sitting in their respective locker rooms, not on the bench.

I am going flagrant on both fouls and I would have gone flagrant on the initial foul even if it wasn't followed by the kick.

I don't have offsetting, it is not a double foul. I am going to administer in order of occurrence.
Remember, players or youth members of a team are "disqualified" and sent to the bench; adult members or personnel of the team are ejected, and sent away from the team and visual confines of the playing area, and are not to have contact with the team during the rest of the contest. Only in instances in which the presence of the penalized, and disqualified youth member of the team would be severely disruptive to the continuation of the game, is that youth team member sent away from the confines of the playing area, and that must be done with adult supervision.
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . .

Last edited by Rob1968; Mon Jan 11, 2016 at 12:44pm.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
Flagrant/Intentional on the initial foul
No such thing as a "Flagrant Intentional" foul.

It can be one or the other (or neither), but not both.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:31am
Dad Dad is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
No such thing as a "Flagrant Intentional" foul.

It can be one or the other (or neither), but not both.
He didn't say flagrant intentional. Flagrant/Intention = pick one.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad View Post
He didn't say flagrant intentional. Flagrant/Intention = pick one.
I don't think that's what he meant, based on his later posts.

But if it was then it's not a choice between "Flagrant" and "Technical" in the next part of his post.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flagrant/Intentional Cav0 Basketball 59 Thu Jan 19, 2012 03:58am
intentional vs flagrant Ptflea2 Basketball 31 Fri May 21, 2010 10:15am
Flagrant or Intentional? Welpe Basketball 43 Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:24pm
Flagrant AND Intentional? Nevadaref Basketball 26 Tue Nov 07, 2006 03:37am
Flagrant/intentional tjchamp Basketball 4 Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:44pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1