Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp
In what world is grabbing an airborne player around both shoulders from behind a legitimate play on the ball? Its not even close.
Easy intentional on the first play that is borderline flagrant as it can be argued that it was "violent" in nature.
And when I assess the flagrant for the kick that was a direct reaction to a dangerous and "violent" play like that, its an equally easy decision to upgrade the first act to flagrant and DQ both IMO.
|
This is my view of the play. I'm OK with calling this intentional and going on if the kick isn't there. As soon as that happens, I'm much more inclined to upgrade the 1st foul.