Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean.
I am involved because I disagreed with your erroneous opinion of the case play in question. It's not that complicated.
|
Again, what was erroneous about my opinion? We were talking about a thrown-in rules as it relates to a violation for BC. We were not talking about what you assumed to be a unilateral comment
(which I am trying to figure out why my statement was assumed to be unilateral anyway, but happens to apply to even all parts of the rule BTW). I was answering a question which was answered by others the same way, but you are going after my comments as if I was giving and opinion when the rules were actually referenced.
OK.
Fri Nov 06, 2015, 05:11pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
