How do you emphasize a rule that doesn't exist?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by OKREF

Exactly. The NFHS is the only rule set I was talking about. This new POE makes it consistent in the NFHS code when dealing with free throw semi circle violations. I wasn't referring to being consistent with the other rule sets. The NFHS clearly wants this called a violation, or they wouldn't have made it a point of emphasis. For whatever reason the rule wasn't changed in the rulebook, either by an editing mistake, oversight by the rules committee. It could have been a number of things.

They sure must not have wanted it bad enough if they forgot to even check the rulebook to make sure it was there.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

They sure must not have wanted it bad enough if they forgot to even check the rulebook to make sure it was there.

Never said they were smart! More than likely they just assumed it was there. Hopefully we will get a bullet point from the NFHS regarding this, until then I will just do what we've been instructed here.