Quote:
Originally Posted by ODog
The scenario was exactly the opposite, wasn't it?
Not saying either scenario should result in a T, just want to make sure I'm understanding the real scenario properly.
Regardless of how it turned out, can you imagine just how out of hand the losing coach (Stone) was to even warrant this impromptu stoppage and summit? Sounds like he was ranting, raving, generally acting a fool and making a mockery of things with his behavior to the point the winning coach finally said, "So I guess I can walk all over the court and raise hell every trip too?"
Nothing, however, justifies one member of a crew walking out on his partner(s) and leaving him/them holding the bag.
|
It was the losing coach who was out of the coaching box and making a arse of himself. The officials (all of them) screwed up by not penalizing the coach for repeatedly being out of the coaching box. They obviously let too much go for too long in this game before this issue came up.
This official really screwed up though in more ways than one.
In addition to his on court actions he was in clear violation of the MHSAA's media policy by commenting to a reporter about the incident. That is very clearly frowned on by the MHSAA and can (should) result in sanctions from the MHSAA.
This official may be a great official on the court (questionable by what I read about the game), but he certainly needs to do a better job with his handling of people.
I agree with the rest of the commenters that I would not be working with him and would decline assignments if he was listed as a partner, or I would ask to be switched off the game.