|
|
|
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 01:59pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
7.08(b) Comment leads me to believe the call was incorrect. The runner is entitled to the base and cannot be guilty of interference unless it is ruled intentional. If it is deemed intentional, then both the runner and the batter-runner should be declared out.
When are they gonna get rid of these replacement umps!!! ... Oh, wait. Wrong forum. 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Catch in Tigers/Twins Game | SanDiegoSteve | Baseball | 16 | Sun May 02, 2010 07:18pm |
| Tigers v Twins: Possible HBP | johnSandlin | Baseball | 10 | Thu Oct 08, 2009 01:32pm |
| Tigers vs Injuns 5-1-09 Laz Diaz? no-call | jwwashburn | Baseball | 68 | Sat May 09, 2009 09:41pm |
| Twins v Nationals home run call reversed | Dakota | Baseball | 11 | Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:10am |
| Tigers Win!!! Tigers Win !! | mick | Basketball | 19 | Tue Sep 30, 2003 06:19pm |
Hybrid Mode
