![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
1. It's always the plate umpire's call. 2-man,l 3-man, 4-man. If he's gets screened, he should move from high school to junior high. Especially in 2-man, the base umpire will never have the correct angle. 2. The runner must have both feet in the running lane or be in jeopardy of an out for interference. If he doesn't interfere, he may run anywhere he wants. 3. The ball doesn't have to hit the batter-runner. But if it is thrown and the fielder covering first misses it, the umpire must judge it was a quality throw. If yes, BR is out. If no, E2 (or whoever). 4. If the fielder behind the runner DOES NOT THROW, there can be no interference. It's different when the batter interferes with the catcher's throw to a base. At the plate, the catcher does not have to throw. 5. New this year in NCAA (and already the rule in OBR): If the batter-runner has been advancing legally, as he nears the base he may le\ave the running lane to acquire the base. Jim Evans started preaching that in 1991. In 2007 it finally showed up in the book. See section 282 in the 2012 BRD. This is pretty easy stuff though it is one of the rules many amateur umpires have difficulty getting their heads around. Mostly, it's like 3 strieks and you're out. The only judgment ever involved is: The throw didn't hit the batter-runner and the covering fielder didn't catch the throw. KISS, fellows. Now, obstruction? That's tough! Running lane? Kindergarden. Of course, one must admit in some venues it takes guts to make that call. But if you can't, take up soccer. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running lane? | roadking | Softball | 6 | Mon Oct 03, 2011 08:15am |
Running lane | grimjack5150 | Softball | 7 | Sat May 10, 2008 10:51pm |
Running Lane? | DG | Baseball | 14 | Wed May 18, 2005 04:42pm |
Running Lane | englanj5 | Baseball | 13 | Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:39pm |
30' Running Lane | bobbrix | Softball | 16 | Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:20am |