The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
bat question

Hi guys,
Football basketball guy here just looking for a little clarification.

The -3 designation for aluminum bats, is intended to make bats perform more like wood correct?

My son plays in a youth league (13-14) yr olds. Not sure of which rule set, most like a modification of some other set. However it apparantly says that in order for a bat to be legal it must have the -3 designation.

If a kid came to the plate with a wood bat with out the -3 designation, would you allow it in the game or throw it out because it doesn't say -3?
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 10:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Non-wood bats can be much lighter than wood bats of the same length. So the ratio restriction limits how fast a given player can swing a bat of a given length. So, yes, that's somewhat to make it more like wood: but the BBCOR and BESR standards are more about performance than the ratio.

The penalty for an illegal bat is that the batter is out. If detected before the batter entered the batters box, we simply disallow the use of the bat. If the batter gets a hit with an illegal bat it's a little more complicated.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Speaking FED rules, the -3 rule applies to bats "not made of a single piece of wood". See rule 1-3-2c.

There are no restrictions on weight to length ratio on wood bats.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 11:52pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
Speaking FED rules, the -3 rule applies to bats "not made of a single piece of wood". See rule 1-3-2c.

There are no restrictions on weight to length ratio on wood bats.
Check the FED rule book, I was thinking 36" was the maximum length of a one piece wood bat.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 08:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
Check the FED rule book, I was thinking 36" was the maximum length of a one piece wood bat.
Correct as per 1-3-3.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 09:11am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
There are no restrictions on weight to length ratio on wood bats.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
Check the FED rule book, I was thinking 36" was the maximum length of a one piece wood bat.
Length is NOT a ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 10:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
Length is NOT a ratio.
Of course, neither is the restriction. –3 is a differential, not a ratio.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
There's no differential limit for wood bats because they tend to limit themselves. A bat that's too long and too light (less than –3) is likely to break, which is not an advantage for the batter.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 07, 2012, 01:12pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
Length is NOT a ratio.
I know, and when they say way to rake it, it doesn't mean they batted with a rake. (or fixed the field for that matter either).

Years ago I had a maple bat that was a 35-29. You don't see that everyday. That little extra weight toward the end gave it some good pop at a very light weight. Less weight=more bat speed. The best of both worlds.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western, Pa
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmathews View Post
Hi guys,
Football basketball guy here just looking for a little clarification.

The -3 designation for aluminum bats, is intended to make bats perform more like wood correct?

My son plays in a youth league (13-14) yr olds. Not sure of which rule set, most like a modification of some other set. However it apparantly says that in order for a bat to be legal it must have the -3 designation.

If a kid came to the plate with a wood bat with out the -3 designation, would you allow it in the game or throw it out because it doesn't say -3?

If your sons league is governed by Little League International the bbcor rating is only required on composit bats. Those ones must be -3 with the bbcor stamp on them. All other aluminum bats are legal, provided they comply with the proper barrell deminsions and drop requirements. However you may want to inquire with the local league to see if they have implemented their own league by-laws regarding the bats.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 12:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend View Post
If your sons league is governed by Little League International the bbcor rating is only required on composit bats. Those ones must be -3 with the bbcor stamp on them. All other aluminum bats are legal, provided they comply with the proper barrell deminsions and drop requirements. However you may want to inquire with the local league to see if they have implemented their own league by-laws regarding the bats.
The BBCOR is for all bats not made of wood for Little League International rules

Aluminum or composite.

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C View Post
The BBCOR is for all bats not made of wood for Little League International rules

Aluminum or composite.

Rita
Not so in minors/majors.

In Juniors? Not per the rule book.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western, Pa
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Not so in minors/majors.

In Juniors? Not per the rule book.
Thank you Rich, she is incorrect bbcor has nothing to do with the 9-12 year old age groups
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend View Post
Thank you Rich, she is incorrect bbcor has nothing to do with the 9-12 year old age groups
We weren't talking about that age group.

9-12 have BPF 1.15 and composite barrels must be on the approved list.

I misread before i posted. Juniors, only composite bats must be BBCOR. Seniors, all non-wood must be BBCOR.

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 06, 2012, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
Not so in minors/majors.

In Juniors? Not per the rule book.
Yes, not for minors/majors. But we weren't talking about that age group.

I don't know where I was looking when I looked it up before I posted. But you are correct. For Juniors, it's only the composite bats that must be BBCOR.

For Seniors, (we have no Juniors in our league this season) the rule is all bats not wood must be BBCOR, -3. Aluminum or composite.

I really don't understand where people get the idea that wood bats are under the same rules. It's clear enough in the rules.

Oh wait, I guess I'm expecting people to read the rules...

Rita

Last edited by Rita C; Wed Jun 06, 2012 at 01:26pm. Reason: additional information.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question on a play and a mechanics question. aevans410 Baseball 11 Mon May 12, 2008 09:23am
two questions - start of half question and free throw question hoopguy Basketball 6 Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:12pm
Rule Question and Mechanics Question Stair-Climber Softball 15 Fri May 06, 2005 06:44am
Over the back Question? Sorry mistyped my first question CoaachJF Basketball 15 Thu Feb 27, 2003 03:18pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1