More on Batter Interference

[LMan]

Originally Posted by GROUPthink

If he moves there after the catcher has the ball and I feel it's done in order to "get in the way" I have no problem calling this.

I'd call that 'abnormal.'


Batter's not obligated to get on all fours/prone to avoid F2's throw.

YMMV.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by LMan

I'd call that 'abnormal.'


Batter's not obligated to get on all fours/prone to avoid F2's throw.

YMMV.

I don't expect him to move at all. But if he does move, he comes under additional scrutiny. That's all I'm saying.