Admit I am out of touch,

[thumpferee]

Originally Posted by dash_riprock

INT in FED (assuming the BR was past the 45' line),

Of course.

Originally Posted by dash_riprock

E2 in OBR.

There is no running lane violation in OBR?

Not that I have a Yankees game scheduled.

[dash_riprock]

Originally Posted by thumpferee

There is no running lane violation in OBR?

Not when F2 airmails it over everyone's head.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by thumpferee

There is no running lane violation in OBR?

It's running lane interference, and OBR has a stricter standard according to which it has to be actual interference with a quality throw.

[thumpferee]

Originally Posted by mbyron

It's running lane interference, and OBR has a stricter standard according to which it has to be actual interference with a quality throw.

It also mentions intentionally interferes if I'm not mistaken, which is what I was referring to. I understand now that a quality throw is also needed.

Thanks

Doesn't there have to be a throw though under FED rules?

[MikeStrybel]

Yes. No throw, no interference in Fed.

[yawetag]

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel

Yes. No throw, no interference in Fed.

For running lane interference, yes. Other forms do not require a throw.

I know you were answering the question, but wanted to keep it clear for a newer umpire reading this.

[Carl Childress]

Originally Posted by MikeStrybel

Yes. No throw, no interference in Fed.

Yes. NFHS Website case play #11, 2002, affirmed case play #7, 2010.

The catcher's gotta throw!

I might point out that the BRD has the answers to almost every play I've seen in the Forum. For all three codes!

Ir's available at Amazon.com. Buy it, try it: If you don't like it, email me a copy of your sales receipt and I'll refund your money. You get to keep the book.

[johnnyg08]

Of course F2 has to throw. I could call runner lane interference three times per game easily, but F3 almost always catches the ball.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by johnnyg08

Of course F2 has to throw. I could call runner lane interference three times per game easily, but F3 almost always catches the ball.

That's beyond surprising. I think I've seen this situation once in the past 3 years. What is going on in your neck of the woods to cause this to happen 3 times per game?

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by Carl Childress

Yes. NFHS Website case play #11, 2002, affirmed case play #7, 2010.

The catcher's gotta throw!

I might point out that the BRD has the answers to almost every play I've seen in the Forum. For all three codes!

Ir's available at Amazon.com. Buy it, try it: If you don't like it, email me a copy of your sales receipt and I'll refund your money. You get to keep the book.

This shameless plug for the BRD brought to you by Papa C.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by thumpferee

It also mentions intentionally interferes if I'm not mistaken, which is what I was referring to. I understand now that a quality throw is also needed.

Thanks

Doesn't there have to be a throw though under FED rules?

Running lane INT does not have to be intentional. You're confusing it with INT with a thrown ball.