The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.KY
Posts: 87
Dead ball strike-out vs hit batsman

Summer game last night. College teams.

Count 3-2, pitch is thrown. Batter "starts" to swing at pitch, moves hands 6" - 8" beginning to swing. Stops short of swinging "strike", did not "offer" cross plate, break wrist or any of the typical things we look for in a check swing. He did not get that far.
Pitched ball hits his hands, PU calls "Dead Ball", hit batter, go to first. Def. coach asks why it was not a dead ball strike. PU says he did not swing at the pitch, he held back. PU asked me (base ump) if he went? I went to PU and said (being in "C") I didn't think that he went far enough to be a strike, but his hands & bat did move early in the swing/pitch.
PU ended up awarding batter 1st, saying the batter did not "strike", held back on the pitch.
Comments?
__________________
UMP64

Thoes who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 09:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP 64 View Post
Summer game last night. College teams.

Count 3-2, pitch is thrown. Batter "starts" to swing at pitch, moves hands 6" - 8" beginning to swing. Stops short of swinging "strike", did not "offer" cross plate, break wrist or any of the typical things we look for in a check swing. He did not get that far.
Pitched ball hits his hands, PU calls "Dead Ball", hit batter, go to first. Def. coach asks why it was not a dead ball strike. PU says he did not swing at the pitch, he held back. PU asked me (base ump) if he went? I went to PU and said (being in "C") I didn't think that he went far enough to be a strike, but his hands & bat did move early in the swing/pitch.
PU ended up awarding batter 1st, saying the batter did not "strike", held back on the pitch.
Comments?
If he didn't offer (strike) at the pitch it's a HBP. What's the controversy?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 09:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 175
Good call. Not in strike zone and no swing, so he gets a free trip to first.

Even if you say that he did not get out of the way of the pitch it is still recorded as what it was, Ball 4. Call it a dead-ball walk if you want.
__________________
Ump Rube
-----------------------------------------------------
Ump (uhmp) shorted form; an official in a sport who rules on plays.
Rube (roob) slang; sports fan who listens to KFAN in Minneapolis, MN.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.KY
Posts: 87
Reply

The batter started to swing, and I think the Def.coach did not realize he "held" or did not swing to commit a strike. Simply put, must the batter commit a strike to be a dead ball strike? Maybe I answered my own question?
__________________
UMP64

Thoes who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 09:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP 64 View Post
The batter started to swing, and I think the Def.coach did not realize he "held" or did not swing to commit a strike. Simply put, must the batter commit a strike to be a dead ball strike? Maybe I answered my own question?
So I guesss the lightbulb lit?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP 64 View Post
The batter started to swing, and I think the Def.coach did not realize he "held" or did not swing to commit a strike. Simply put, must the batter commit a strike to be a dead ball strike? Maybe I answered my own question?
It's the same as any other "checked swing" (or whatever the correct wording in the book is). What would you have ruled if the ball hadn't hit him?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP 64 View Post
PU asked me (base ump) if he went? I went to PU and said (being in "C") I didn't think that he went far enough to be a strike, but his hands & bat did move early in the swing/pitch.
Comments?
Plate ump came to you, asked if he went, answer should be NO.

I know this is a HTBT, but a simple NO would be better. Too much conversation or a lengthy conference also looks bad.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 11:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Your decision should be no different if you are in A, B or C. Either the batter offers at the pitch or he does not. Please don't say that you don't have a good look in C because we don't want another 10 page discussion about this. Just remember, you are judging, every time the batter swings, as to whether he offered at the pitch or not. Your partner is counting on you to be there for help no matter what position you are in as the BU so when he comes to you, it's either "Yes, he went" or "No, he didn't go" with the proper signals.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 11:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP 64 View Post
Stops short of swinging "strike", did not "offer" cross plate, break wrist or any of the typical things we look for in a check swing.


Comments?
What on Earth does the plate have to do with this? Or the wrists?

Can we put two behind the ear of both these myths right now?

Honestly fellas, that's how these things get perpetuated. If umpires are saying the bat didn't cross the plate, what chance do have out there?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 12:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Oz is exactly right here. When you start analyzing what you thought you saw or didn't see, and then discussing it, you are contributing to the uncertainty about your calls and given the DC more to argue about.

PU - Did he go? BU - No he did not.

Short and sweet and to the point. It also demonstrates to the DC that you were on top of the call and had no doubt about. Period.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 09:18pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
This is a similar situation to a batter who is trying to bunt but gets hit by the pitch - it's not unusual for the defensive team to ask for an appeal on the bunt attempt even though the batter gets drilled in the chest with the pitch....it looks goofy so they ask.....but that doesn't mean he offered at the pitch, even if the bat doesn't OBVIOUSLY get "pulled back".

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 13, 2011, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
This is a similar situation to a batter who is trying to bunt but gets hit by the pitch - it's not unusual for the defensive team to ask for an appeal on the bunt attempt even though the batter gets drilled in the chest with the pitch....it looks goofy so they ask.....but that doesn't mean he offered at the pitch, even if the bat doesn't OBVIOUSLY get "pulled back".

JJ
I think I get your inference that the bat does not have to be pulled back on a bunt attempt. Is that what you mean?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 14, 2011, 06:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
ô!ô

Quote:
"I think I get your inference that the bat does not have to be pulled back on a bunt attempt. Is that what you mean?"
Well, that is the rule.

FED even has it in the Case Book.

T
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 14, 2011, 07:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C View Post
Well, that is the rule.

FED even has it in the Case Book.

T
I believe the original play considered college age athletes. Maybe they were goverened by Fed rules for this contest but most just spent the last year with the new half swing (not a checked swing) definition from the NCAA. Rule 2-18 states: a half swing shall be called a strike if the barrel head of the bat passes the batter's front hip. Previously, the rule stated "the front edge of home plate" but that neglected the batter's position in the box. The 2011 NCAA Baseball guide covered this on page 13.

The Major League Baseball rulebook doesn't contain an official definition for a checked swing; it is the decision of the umpire presiding. Here is what the Red Book states: "The umpire’s decision on a check swing shall be based entirely on his judgment as to whether or not the batter struck at the pitch."

In Jim Evans Umpire Mechanics Book:
Half-swing describes the batter’s action when he interrupts his attempt to hit a pitched ball. If the batter interrupts his swing after starting the forward motion of the bat but before committing to the pitch, the half-swing shall be adjudged a ball. If, in the judgment of the umpire, he went too far and committed to the pitch but missed, it shall be considered a swinging strike.

"Was it a swing?" varies from umpire to umpire and game to game.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 14, 2011, 08:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Mike:

All you write is very accurate.

I was only talking about "not pulling the bat back" during a bunting situation.

All rules codes are the same, in that, you must offer at a pitch while bunting to be a strike.

A batter does not need "pull the bat back."

T
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swinging 3rd Strike Dead Ball njdevs00cup Baseball 4 Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:53pm
dead ball strike CecilOne Softball 10 Tue Jul 15, 2008 08:25am
Dropped 3rd Strike - Dead Ball? Spence Softball 12 Tue May 17, 2005 09:06am
Dead ball strike question? 3afan Softball 5 Thu Sep 23, 2004 03:23pm
Legally putting ball in play, dead ball violations BJ Moose Baseball 20 Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:09am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1