Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Why not 8-5.d?
|
I overlooked that one, the wording of it implies that it does not apply to the batter-runner. But I see how you might apply this one here. I think, however, it would be a stretch. The spirit and intent of this rule is that runners who are hit with thrown balls while running the bases are not
ispo facto guilty of interference. The batter-runner is strictly neither a batter nor a runner. Given that, he would not allowed to be legally within the runner's lane and reach up and grab a thrown ball; I think 2-50 covers that situation.
Leaving aside our judgment of the interference by the batter-runner; this is a very difficult rule application.
Thu Jun 16, 2011, 02:36pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
