Texas - ASU game 3

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by t-rex

An article in the Austin American-Statesman cites that the batter "was ruled out Section 50, A.R. 2 of the baseball manual."

I am hoping someone can expand on the what baseball manual is actually referenced in this article.

It's the NCAA interference rule.

I don't see how they could judge that F2 was hindered in making a play on R1, since there was no play possible on R1.

[MrUmpire]

Originally Posted by mbyron

It's the NCAA interference rule.

I don't see how they could judge that F2 was hindered in making a play on R1, since there was no play possible on R1.

I didn't see the play. Despite ball four, was R1 stealing?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

I didn't see the play. Despite ball four, was R1 stealing?

Yes - plus full count and check swing. I'm sure catcher was throwing in case he appealed and got a strike out of it.

And as much as I was rooting for UT --- I didn't see any reason for interference on BR either. Nomah was going ON and ON about no contact, and other irrelevant nonsense. But I didn't see INT either. Not because there wasn't a play - but because I simply didn't see BR interfering with the throw at all.

Would love to have been a fly in that umpire huddle.

[JJ]

Any chance someone can post the video?

JJ

[GA Umpire]

YouTube - ‪NCAA Bat int. June 12‬‏

[umpjim]

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Posted on YouTube off someone's TV screen.

[zm1283]

Don't see interference from what the video shows.

[umpjim]

Box score shows Wilson out on BI with a (3-2 KBFBB) count. They show no BB for him.
http://http://www.texassports.com/sp....html#GAME.PLY