View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 13, 2011, 10:49am
mbyron mbyron is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-rex View Post
An article in the Austin American-Statesman cites that the batter "was ruled out Section 50, A.R. 2 of the baseball manual."

I am hoping someone can expand on the what baseball manual is actually referenced in this article.
It's the NCAA interference rule.

I don't see how they could judge that F2 was hindered in making a play on R1, since there was no play possible on R1.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote