The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 06:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Obstruction: Mets vs. Pirates

Obstruction call on Reyes proves costly for Mets | mets.com: News

Any thoughts? Please withhold your opinion until you see the arial view.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 07:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
From the ground, it appears that Tabata had to hitch his stride in order to avoid contact with Reyes. Since Layne was not in the air, he would have only had his backdoor view and thus, his call was made tougher. His delay was unfortunate, it's almost as if he said, "What the heck was that?" and then made his call. From the air, it was pretty obvious, even to this Cubs fan (despise the Mets) that Tabata got away with one.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 07:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
I don't know. It doesn't take much for OBS to be OBS - and it appears to me that the runner slows and turns a bit to avoid Reyes... and then is only barely thrown out. Not sure I'd have called it, but I don't think it was an egregious error on the umpire's part. He appears to have grounds for the call.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 07:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
His delayed call is what makes this tough. Tabata hesitated going around two while glancing at the fielder, making this an even tougher call. Did that hitch cause Tabata to be thrown out, not likely but apparently Layne thought it did.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I like the call. F6 has no business being there, right in the path of the runner rounding 2B.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 08:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I like the call. F6 has no business being there, right in the path of the runner rounding 2B.
I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
After being "thrown out" the runner immediately started heading for the dugout. That tells me that HE did not feel he was obstructed.
I also agree with 2 previous posters. F6 standing where he did only invites trouble.

Last edited by rbmartin; Tue Jun 14, 2011 at 08:58am.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obstruction Call Mets/Phillies njdevs00cup Baseball 21 Fri May 08, 2009 02:04pm
Reds vs. Pirates..appeal play rbmartin Baseball 4 Sat Sep 01, 2007 02:41am
Illegal slide into Pirates' F6 SAump Baseball 8 Wed Aug 29, 2007 01:07am
Pirates @ Astros -- Garner Ejection tmp44 Baseball 7 Sat Apr 22, 2006 05:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1