The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
After being "thrown out" the runner immediately started heading for the dugout. That tells me that HE did not feel he was obstructed.
All that tells me is that he did not think that obstruction was called. It tells me nothing as to whether he did or did not feel he was obstructed.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Excellently handled by Layne....proper call after taking the time to evaluate the play.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 05:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northwest suburbs of Chicago
Posts: 645
The question of timing is relevant. We all call things when they register with our brain. Well, I've called a few before then but that's a different matter. Layne did not react well and aggressively to this play. There is no doubt that he is one of the very best but this was not an example of obstruction being called in MLB lately. There are plenty of examples and almost all involve adamant verbalizations and signaling.

As for the runner giving up and walking away, I don't think that's a huge consideration. He was out, he knew it and most players don't know rule enforcement like we do. He should have been pissed at himself for getting caught after he slowed approaching and rounding second.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2011, 05:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStrybel View Post
The question of timing is relevant. We all call things when they register with our brain. Well, I've called a few before then but that's a different matter. Layne did not react well and aggressively to this play. There is no doubt that he is one of the very best but this was not an example of obstruction being called in MLB lately. There are plenty of examples and almost all involve adamant verbalizations and signaling.

As for the runner giving up and walking away, I don't think that's a huge consideration. He was out, he knew it and most players don't know rule enforcement like we do. He should have been pissed at himself for getting caught after he slowed approaching and rounding second.
This is type b obstruction, and you don't need a big call on this one. You have to determine what happens next. If R1 got thrown out by 15 feet, U2 is not making that call after the dust settles. He's out, fellas.

You need a casual call, with no theatrics for type b. The only thing I would have done differently is point with my left hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obstruction Call Mets/Phillies njdevs00cup Baseball 21 Fri May 08, 2009 02:04pm
Reds vs. Pirates..appeal play rbmartin Baseball 4 Sat Sep 01, 2007 02:41am
Illegal slide into Pirates' F6 SAump Baseball 8 Wed Aug 29, 2007 01:07am
Pirates @ Astros -- Garner Ejection tmp44 Baseball 7 Sat Apr 22, 2006 05:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1