A different take

[bob jenkins]

While I think that's the "right" ruling, I hope they change / clarify the rule next year to match.

[David B]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

While I think that's the "right" ruling, I hope they change / clarify the rule next year to match.

I agree with that. It makes sense that is the "right" ruling, but you have a hard time finding that anywhere in the rulebooks.

Thanks
David

[Rich]

Originally Posted by David B

I agree with that. It makes sense that is the "right" ruling, but you have a hard time finding that anywhere in the rulebooks.

Thanks
David

Regardless, if this was called and I was serving on the protest committee, I'd quickly deny the protest. Baseball has a finite set of rules that cover a countably infinite set of circumstances.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Regardless, if this was called and I was serving on the protest committee, I'd quickly deny the protest. Baseball has a finite set of rules that cover a countably infinite set of circumstances.

Nerd.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Nerd.

Heh heh. It's the only reference I've made using my two math degrees in years. Glad someone appreciated it.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Heh heh. It's the only reference I've made using my two math degrees in years. Glad someone appreciated it.

Reminded me of the Hilbert Hotel...

[Rich]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Reminded me of the Hilbert Hotel...

Ah, a corner of my mind that I thought I had closed.