The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 06:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 109
7.08 violation?

Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | HOU@PHI: Manuel is ejected for disputing bunt single - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 07:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,127
I assume you mean 7.08(a)(1) (running out of his baseline to avoid a tag).

Close, but I think the umpire got it right. As the tag attempt starts, the runner's right foot is already near the foul portion of the running lane (the running lane is NOT relevant for this play -- I mention it only for a reference for the foot). It never gets too far onto the grass.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 07:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
If you're asking about 7.08(a)(1), the answer is, no.

Just because the fielder had to move more than 3 feet to get to the runner, it doesn't follow that the runner moved more than 3 feet out of his baseline.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 07:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 109
I agree with both of you. Bourn didn't go more than 3 feet outside his line. It was close, but I agree with Gibson. I also laughed at the talking heads wanting Gibson to go to the PU. Should he have, maybe. Gibson was closer to the play though. I think he decided to live or die with the call. That is his prerogative.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 11:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by txump81 View Post
I also laughed at the talking heads wanting Gibson to go to the PU. Should he have, maybe.
No, he should not have. It was his call, he got a great look, and he made the right call. No reason to consult.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 11:27am
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
There's no way he was outside of 3 feet once there was a play attempt on him. He started outside all he did was dodge the play attempt. Good call. No reason to ask for help there.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 478
7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 01:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus View Post
7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?
yes
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 24, 2010, 01:43pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus View Post
7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?
Well said. Memorize that, because that point right there busts the misunderstood "he's out of the baseline myth" rule.

I had a play very similar to this just this past weekend. After I stated something like this (not quite as good) but with the same content, the coach could only say in a voice that only he and I could hear "well, I think you should still get your eyes checked" and we both walked away.

I grinned and continued to umpire the game.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Violation?! jdmara Basketball 17 Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:35am
Backcourt violation - 3 second violation Shades of Gray Basketball 15 Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:38pm
Throw-in violation or OOB violation? Nevadaref Basketball 47 Fri Nov 02, 2007 07:15pm
Clever? or a violation ,trying 2 avoid a violation hardwdref Basketball 3 Sat Nov 13, 2004 04:17pm
FT Violation? Troward Basketball 15 Fri Dec 13, 2002 04:49am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1