The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   7.08 violation? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/58911-7-08-violation.html)

txump81 Tue Aug 24, 2010 06:51am

7.08 violation?
 
Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | HOU@PHI: Manuel is ejected for disputing bunt single - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

bob jenkins Tue Aug 24, 2010 07:28am

I assume you mean 7.08(a)(1) (running out of his baseline to avoid a tag).

Close, but I think the umpire got it right. As the tag attempt starts, the runner's right foot is already near the foul portion of the running lane (the running lane is NOT relevant for this play -- I mention it only for a reference for the foot). It never gets too far onto the grass.

mbyron Tue Aug 24, 2010 07:32am

If you're asking about 7.08(a)(1), the answer is, no.

Just because the fielder had to move more than 3 feet to get to the runner, it doesn't follow that the runner moved more than 3 feet out of his baseline.

txump81 Tue Aug 24, 2010 07:39am

I agree with both of you. Bourn didn't go more than 3 feet outside his line. It was close, but I agree with Gibson. I also laughed at the talking heads wanting Gibson to go to the PU. Should he have, maybe. Gibson was closer to the play though. I think he decided to live or die with the call. That is his prerogative.

mbyron Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by txump81 (Post 689852)
I also laughed at the talking heads wanting Gibson to go to the PU. Should he have, maybe.

No, he should not have. It was his call, he got a great look, and he made the right call. No reason to consult.

johnnyg08 Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27am

There's no way he was outside of 3 feet once there was a play attempt on him. He started outside all he did was dodge the play attempt. Good call. No reason to ask for help there.

Rufus Tue Aug 24, 2010 01:24pm

7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?

bob jenkins Tue Aug 24, 2010 01:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 689929)
7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?

yes

johnnyg08 Tue Aug 24, 2010 01:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 689929)
7.08(a)(1) in part says:

A runner’s baseline is established when the tag attempt occurs and is a straight line from the runner to the base he is attempting to reach safely

So that means from the time Howard reached for him and he dodged to avoid it there is a straight line established from that point to the base. If he goes 3 feet outside of that line he would be out. Is that correct?

Well said. Memorize that, because that point right there busts the misunderstood "he's out of the baseline myth" rule.

I had a play very similar to this just this past weekend. After I stated something like this (not quite as good) but with the same content, the coach could only say in a voice that only he and I could hear "well, I think you should still get your eyes checked" and we both walked away.

I grinned and continued to umpire the game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1