The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 12:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Another FED 2 Man Mechanics

Since everyone was so helpful on the last post about mechanics I have a few more..... This is what the State Manual says:

Runner on 1st....Ground ball rolling up the third base line, the PU comes out from behind the plate to make fair/foul call... HERE IS WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND?

"If PU point’s the ball fair and the ball is then thrown to first base, he will then continue up the third base line towards third base and assume responsibility of the runner coming from first to third".

Can anyone give me a reason for this? Again, being the new kid in town I don’t want to stir up anything but just want to know why these mechanics are done this way and cannot get a straight answer except “that’s the way we do it down here”… So my approach is trying to put together reasonable reasons to look at making changes that would be better for putting us in the best position to make calls.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 12:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
A reason the FED manual has something dumb? Nope.

If there were a reason, it wouldn't be dumb. :shrug:

But I will say this: PU has to come up the 3BL for fair/foul, so he won't be able to help will swipe tag etc. at 1B. He might as well get in position for a call at 3B.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
Shouldn't have to go that far up the line? Also since FU is in B what happens to an overthrow? Just bad mechanics to me.....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastordoug View Post
Shouldn't have to go that far up the line? Also since FU is in B what happens to an overthrow? Just bad mechanics to me.....
Becaue you're heading that way, your be in proper position for that banger at 3B if it should develop. If there is a play on R1 at 2B, then watch for the interference and head back toward the line for that overthrow you're worried about. If there isn't a play on R1 @ 2B, than head toward the library for the back door play at thrid. There isn't any reason for BU to have to air mail the call from the vicinity of A. If there is an overthrow, you won't be having a play at 3B, so stop, pick up the ball and head back toward the plate, (remember you're still responsible for R1's touch of 3B) the overthrow will be your responsibility as BU takes BR around. To quote Jim Evans....sometimes you just have to umpire. The basic concept is the bang bang play at 3B is more important. Although CCA mechanics say, stay in the vicinity for the plate for the swipe tag pulled foot, and let BU take the second play at 3B should it occur, and air mail that call. Personally, I prefer the Pro mechanic of moving to 3B for that very reason. Once R1 is out at 2B, you can cut across the infield toward the 1B line and gain distance toward the bag for the pulled foot, swipe tag, as well as the overthrow. Many here will disagree, however this is what is being taught in the Pro schools.
__________________
Its' not a matter of being right or wrong, it's a matter of working hard to get it right.

Last edited by justanotherblue; Thu Feb 04, 2010 at 01:35pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastordoug View Post
Quote:
Since everyone was so helpful on the last post about mechanics I have a few more..... This is what the State Manual says:

Runner on 1st....Ground ball rolling up the third base line, the PU comes out from behind the plate to make fair/foul call... HERE IS WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND?

"If PU point’s the ball fair and the ball is then thrown to first base, he will then continue up the third base line towards third base and assume responsibility of the runner coming from first to third".

Can anyone give me a reason for this? Again, being the new kid in town I don’t want to stir up anything but just want to know why these mechanics are done this way and cannot get a straight answer except “that’s the way we do it down here”… So my approach is trying to put together reasonable reasons to look at making changes that would be better for putting us in the best position to make calls
.
In FED, whenever we have R1 and the ball is hit in the infield, for the most part the BU is on his her/own on a play at first base. In other words do not expect any help from the PU.

Why!

In FED they have the FPSR and it's the responsibility of the PU to watch for a possible violation of that rule should the defense throw to second base. Therefore, whenever the ball is hit in the infield the PU will come out and get in the best possible position to view a possible FPSR violation.

Reason being: The BU is turning away from the play as soon as F4/F6 releases the ball to make the call at first base and therefore, will not be in position or see any possible interference on the part of R1 UNLESS it happens right in front of him.

In your OP we had a slow roller up the thrid base line and the PU following the ball to call Fair / Foul, Therefore, the PU is "right there" should there be a play at third base. If there is an overthrow the PU can adjust rather easily.

In summary the mechanic makes sense.

Also, FWIW I wish they would do away with "the PU should be ready in case of a pulled foot / swipe tag"

BU's should make THEIR own calls PERIOD. The PU already has enough responsibilities and the BU should be able to make THEIR own calls. Also, some BU's use this as a "crutch" way too much.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 02:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
I do understand the thinking behind already "being there" however I still believe that there is more of a probability of something happening around 1st (overthrow, pulled foot, 45 ft line....) which would serve the PU better to be over that way. Isn't the BU first concern with a play at 2nd anyway which means he shouldn't be moving towards 1st?
As for the way "pro" is teaching that mechanic I have not attended a pro camp but haven't seen to many pro games run a 2 man system? But sure appricate the comments.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 02:41pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastordoug View Post
I do understand the thinking behind already "being there" however I still believe that there is more of a probability of something happening around 1st (overthrow, pulled foot, 45 ft line....) which would serve the PU better to be over that way. Isn't the BU first concern with a play at 2nd anyway which means he shouldn't be moving towards 1st?
As for the way "pro" is teaching that mechanic I have not attended a pro camp but haven't seen to many pro games run a 2 man system? But sure appricate the comments.
Pulled feet and swipe throws and other such squirrels are the job of the base umpire who is responsible for the call at first. As the plate umpire, I'll look if I have absolutely nothing to do, but all other responsibilities come first. Period.

Life would be so much easier on umpires who work hard to get into proper position if more umpires would simply say "No, I won't get help. It's my call to make, I saw it, and that's that."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 03:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
[QUOTE=pastordoug;658493]
Quote:
I do understand the thinking behind already "being there" however I still believe that there is more of a probability of something happening around 1st (overthrow, pulled foot, 45 ft line....) which would serve the PU better to be over that way. Isn't the BU first concern with a play at 2nd anyway which means he shouldn't be moving towards 1st?
If something is happening around first base that call belongs to the BU. The BU should not be looking at the PU as a crutch. If the BU is having trouble with the swipe tag / pulled foot then they need to work on their mechanics.

In a 2 person system we sacrifice distance for angle so on a play at second base the BU cannot over commit.

Also, as I stated to you in FED there is the FPSR.

In FED, it is the responsibilty of the PU to look for possible interference at second base so when we have R1 and the ball is hit in the infield after Fair / Foul the PU should be moving towards the mound or what's more commonly termed "the Library" in case a play is made at second base.

In your OP F5 threw to F3 so the PU can now move to cover third base. If the ball is overthrown the Pu should have no trouble in adjusting.

I am with Rich. BU's need to start being responsible for THEIR own calls and not rely on the PU. The PU already has plenty of responsibilities in a 2 person system.

IMO, the reason you are having trouble understanding this mechanic or disagree with this mechanic is because you want the PU to "be there" on a play at first should there be a swipe tag / pulled foot and IMO the BU needs to make this call PERIOD. Also, since we have a throw coming from 3rd base for all practical purposes the 45 ft lane rule is moot.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
There's a couple of reasons for my "resistance" and he most likely is not using that particular mechanic in previous state.... Having said that my real issue is just wanting both PU and BU to be in the BEST position that 2 man allows...

Concerning distance and angle, while we knowing lose distance as a result of just 2 man, IMO we can gain both by being in the best position which of course varies from play to play....

Thanks.... BTW does your association practice that rotation?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 04, 2010, 07:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by pastordoug View Post
haven't seen to many pro games run a 2 man system?

True, but they teach 2 man at the pro schools. Short season, A-ball - all 2 man. You have to be able to do 2 man before you can do 3 or 4 man. So that's what they teach.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 07, 2010, 02:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManInBlue View Post
True, but they teach 2 man at the pro schools. Short season, A-ball - all 2 man. You have to be able to do 2 man before you can do 3 or 4 man. So that's what they teach.
Let's also not forget that most of the students don't even make it to Short Season ball. I don't know of a state that uses 3- or 4-man for regular season high school games, and I don't think college uses it in anything but Div 1, but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help me with my mechanics? DC_Ref12 Basketball 24 Fri Feb 16, 2007 03:03pm
6 man mechanics Texas Aggie Football 17 Fri Feb 16, 2007 02:25pm
NCAA Mechanics, NFHS Rules/Mechanics InvisibleRef Basketball 4 Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06am
Mechanics ref18 Basketball 30 Sun Jan 04, 2004 06:57pm
Three man mechanics stewcall Basketball 3 Thu Dec 19, 2002 05:21pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1