The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 01:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
J/R advantageous 4th out appeal play page citations: 20,32,44,49,77,87
Here is the relevant portion of a post by someone identified as "Wendlestedt" at the Wendlestedt message board:

This is a base (first) never reached, not one which was not touched or not properly tagged up from. There is no appeal for never reaching a base. Unfortunately, neither Jaska and Roder have been in the game for sometime now, and even when they were, they were so analytical with the rules that they often failed to get what the rulebook intended for. That is what I expect happened in this case. They are what we call at umpire school "rule book lawyers".

Walk off Walk - Umpire School Forum
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 01:18pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
J/R advantageous 4th out appeal play page citations: 20,32,44,49,77,87
One citation I will happily ignore.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 48
I was not thinking of an appeal play. In the orignal play description, I was thining that the third baseman could throw to first to get a fourth out before the batter reaches first.

I just looked in the MLB rule book, and I confess that I did not find anything that clearly justifies this.

That is why I usually just read this board and keep my mouth shut
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 02:08pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by starman View Post
I was thining that the third baseman could throw to first to get a fourth out before the batter reaches first.
"I'll do the thining around here, Babalooey!" - Quickdraw McGraw
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by nopachunts View Post
By rule, if the BR did not reach 1B safely where he would be the third out, no runner can score.

In the OP, Fivesdadda is asking if R3 could score if R3 crossed the plate prior to R2 being tagged out for the third out. If 1B was open and the BR never safely attained 1B, R3's run would not count even though R3 crossed HP prior to R2 being tagged.
I think the rule is no run can score IF the BR is put out before reaching first, not if he doesn't reach first safely. Two different things it seems, and importantly so.

Other posters have shown that not touching first on the OP play is not appealable, so I don't see how you wouldn't count the run nopachunts. Whether he touches first or not is irrelevant on the non-force 3rd out of R2, and the defense can't appeal the BR not touching first. Thus, score the run.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
This play has been around since Al Gore invented the interwebs:

R2, R3, two outs. B5 grounds to F6. As B5 runs toward first, he stumbles, breaks his ankle and lies writhing in pain on the ground. The following happens in order: R3 touches the plate. F6 throws the ball to F5 who tags R2 (three outs). F5 throws to F3 who steps on first (4 outs?).

Does the run count?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 03:16pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
This play has been around since Al Gore invented the interwebs:

R2, R3, two outs. B5 grounds to F6. As B5 runs toward first, he stumbles, breaks his ankle and lies writhing in pain on the ground. The following happens in order: R3 touches the plate. F6 throws the ball to F5 who tags R2 (three outs). F5 throws to F3 who steps on first (4 outs?).

Does the run count?
Day game or night game?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 03:21pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
This play has been around since Al Gore invented the interwebs:

R2, R3, two outs. B5 grounds to F6. As B5 runs toward first, he stumbles, breaks his ankle and lies writhing in pain on the ground. The following happens in order: R3 touches the plate. F6 throws the ball to F5 who tags R2 (three outs). F5 throws to F3 who steps on first (4 outs?).

Does the run count?
no run?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 03:32pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Day game or night game?
Later afternoon game that ends in the evening.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 03:59pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Directly from the MLBUM page 42 in relation to rule 4.09 OBR:

1. No run shall score during a play in which the third out is made by the batter-runner before he touches first base.
2. No run shall score during a play in which the third out is a force out.
3. Following runners are not affected by an act of a preceeding runner unless two are out.

It doesn't really talk about the advantageous 4th out appeal here. I think they would have to execute the 4th out appeal in order to nullify the run based on #1.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 04:28pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
From OBR rule 7.10, page 74:

Appeal plays may require an umpire to recognize an apparent "fourth out"." If the third out is made during a play in which an appeal play is sustained on another runner, the appeal play decision takes precedence in determining the out. If there is more than one appeal during a play that ends a half-inning, the defense may elect to take the out that gives it the advantage. For the purpose of this rule, the defensive team has "left the field" when the pitcher and all infielders have left fair territory on their way to the bench or clubhouse.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
From OBR rule 7.10, page 74:

Appeal plays may require an umpire to recognize an apparent "fourth out"." If the third out is made during a play in which an appeal play is sustained on another runner, the appeal play decision takes precedence in determining the out. If there is more than one appeal during a play that ends a half-inning, the defense may elect to take the out that gives it the advantage. For the purpose of this rule, the defensive team has "left the field" when the pitcher and all infielders have left fair territory on their way to the bench or clubhouse.
Please re-read my post #12 as to what are acceptable appeals for an apparent "fourth out."

2.00 An APPEAL is the act of a fielder in claiming violation of the rules by the offensive team.

There is no rule that requires the BR to touch 1st base after 3 outs have been recorded. No violation, no appeal.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 04:41pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
okay, so are you saying that the run scores? minus the 4th out appeal?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 04:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
An appeal is for a violation of the rules or a base running error. What error happened here? He didn't miss the base because he never got there to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 11, 2009, 04:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
okay, so are you saying that the run scores? minus the 4th out appeal?
With the classic OP that Bob posted.

Quote:
R2, R3, two outs. B5 grounds to F6. As B5 runs toward first, he stumbles, breaks his ankle and lies writhing in pain on the ground. The following happens in order: R3 touches the plate. F6 throws the ball to F5 who tags R2 (three outs). F5 throws to F3 who steps on first (4 outs?).

Does the run count?
Yes, I am saying the run scores.

The appeal is not recognized as it is not an appealable offense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Routine Situation and Odd Ruling Ref Ump Welsch Softball 39 Wed May 06, 2009 03:03pm
HELP WITH A RULING jason181988 Baseball 12 Mon May 02, 2005 04:38pm
T Situation Ruling BigGref Basketball 11 Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:35pm
Need help on a ruling kimo Softball 34 Thu Aug 14, 2003 04:45pm
Ruling help hoopcoach98 Basketball 11 Mon Apr 01, 2002 04:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1