|
|||
Quote:
This is a base (first) never reached, not one which was not touched or not properly tagged up from. There is no appeal for never reaching a base. Unfortunately, neither Jaska and Roder have been in the game for sometime now, and even when they were, they were so analytical with the rules that they often failed to get what the rulebook intended for. That is what I expect happened in this case. They are what we call at umpire school "rule book lawyers". Walk off Walk - Umpire School Forum |
|
|||
I was not thinking of an appeal play. In the orignal play description, I was thining that the third baseman could throw to first to get a fourth out before the batter reaches first.
I just looked in the MLB rule book, and I confess that I did not find anything that clearly justifies this. That is why I usually just read this board and keep my mouth shut |
|
|||
"I'll do the thining around here, Babalooey!" - Quickdraw McGraw
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
Quote:
Other posters have shown that not touching first on the OP play is not appealable, so I don't see how you wouldn't count the run nopachunts. Whether he touches first or not is irrelevant on the non-force 3rd out of R2, and the defense can't appeal the BR not touching first. Thus, score the run. |
|
|||
This play has been around since Al Gore invented the interwebs:
R2, R3, two outs. B5 grounds to F6. As B5 runs toward first, he stumbles, breaks his ankle and lies writhing in pain on the ground. The following happens in order: R3 touches the plate. F6 throws the ball to F5 who tags R2 (three outs). F5 throws to F3 who steps on first (4 outs?). Does the run count? |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Later afternoon game that ends in the evening.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Directly from the MLBUM page 42 in relation to rule 4.09 OBR:
1. No run shall score during a play in which the third out is made by the batter-runner before he touches first base. 2. No run shall score during a play in which the third out is a force out. 3. Following runners are not affected by an act of a preceeding runner unless two are out. It doesn't really talk about the advantageous 4th out appeal here. I think they would have to execute the 4th out appeal in order to nullify the run based on #1.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
From OBR rule 7.10, page 74:
Appeal plays may require an umpire to recognize an apparent "fourth out"." If the third out is made during a play in which an appeal play is sustained on another runner, the appeal play decision takes precedence in determining the out. If there is more than one appeal during a play that ends a half-inning, the defense may elect to take the out that gives it the advantage. For the purpose of this rule, the defensive team has "left the field" when the pitcher and all infielders have left fair territory on their way to the bench or clubhouse.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
2.00 An APPEAL is the act of a fielder in claiming violation of the rules by the offensive team. There is no rule that requires the BR to touch 1st base after 3 outs have been recorded. No violation, no appeal. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
The appeal is not recognized as it is not an appealable offense. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Routine Situation and Odd Ruling | Ref Ump Welsch | Softball | 39 | Wed May 06, 2009 03:03pm |
HELP WITH A RULING | jason181988 | Baseball | 12 | Mon May 02, 2005 04:38pm |
T Situation Ruling | BigGref | Basketball | 11 | Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:35pm |
Need help on a ruling | kimo | Softball | 34 | Thu Aug 14, 2003 04:45pm |
Ruling help | hoopcoach98 | Basketball | 11 | Mon Apr 01, 2002 04:09pm |