![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Some prefer C, but like you stated, I like to be close to the play. But, I've worked with other groups who mandate move to C. Playing percentages, what is it, less than 5% of plays at 3rd, so why do we spend so much time worrying about 3rd?? Thanks David |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
|
Why C?
I hate to be so old now, I remember "old school stuff"....
The old timers taught me that "being ahead of the runner" is the important thing, that is why many people are in C even with R3. You may say that you can't be ahead of the runner in C, but many times that run is the important runner in the game, and if there is a play on him at #B, it can be a significant play in the game. The concepts that are so important in teaching mechanics today, like "angle over distance" and "cover the money play" were not as emphasized as they are now. when I went to school in the 1980's neither of these concepts were even discussed. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Criticality of the play should dictate which position BU takes, the closer to HP the more critical the play.
R1, B you have both covered, PO and the steal. R2, C, PO and steal attempt. R3, C, PO attempt. R1, R2, C, PO at 2nd more critical than PO at 1B, steal of 3rd more critical than steal of 2nd. etc. etc. B with R3, or C with R1 is good for one thing, killing grass. The guys in Wi, if they think "making smaller sideways profiles is gonne keep em safer, rethink that. The human head is pretty much round, and the eyes are best used for tracking a moving object while "facing it".
__________________
SLAS |
|
|||
|
Well, as we can see here , when in Rome do as you like.
Actually depending on the level, usually depends on wether I am in B or C. Usually, in games where da boys shave you rarely see a pickoff at third. HS JV and below it becomes a pain in the butt sometimes but, you will have a closer view. I am always in B with R1 only. Just easier to sell on a close pick. |
|
|||
|
I've experimented and found that if I stay in C with R1 & R3, the pitcher will try to pick off R1 or there is a banger at first. Nothing happens at R3.
If I decide to go to B with R1 & R3, the catcher snaps a quick throw to third, or the runner steals second on the first pitch with no throw and I go back to C anyway.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can anyone explain the theory behind the superwide stance? | Dakota | Softball | 19 | Thu Jul 19, 2007 03:17pm |
| Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm |
| Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm |
| Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm |
| Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |