The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 07:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkumpire View Post
1. HC has conference with pitcher, and replaces him. No conference charged.
2. Sometime during the conference he heads to the dugout. By rule, conference is over, correct?
3. He then goes out to talk with infielders. HOW is that not another conference?
4. If he has conferences left, how is it illegal to use one?
5. Your rule does not apply here, if he had no conferences left, then he could not cross the foul line and have another conference. There is nothing in the rules that say he cannot use two or three conferences during one AB if he wants to, as long as the number of conferences used in the game do not add up to more than three.
6. If he goes into the dugout for a reason, say, equipment needed changed, and he goes out to an infielder, and tells the PU why, that's another story.
He had every chance to talk to the infielders while he was on the mound making a pitching change. In the OC he gave that right up when he went past the foul line.

Please show me where this is wrong.
1) We agree here
2) Still agree
3) This is where we disagree. Last time I'm going to explain it:
FED 3-1-2: If a pitcher is replaced while his team is on defense, the substitute pitcher shall pitch to the batter then at bat or any substitute for that batter until such batter is put out or reaches base or until a third out is made. To ensure that the requirements of this article be fulfilled, the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule.

Read it again:

the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule.[/

The coach makes the change, goes back to dugout, decides he wants to come back out. Umpire should say, "No, coach, you can not come back out for a conference until the pitcher has faced a batter or recorded a third out."
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
1) We agree here
2) Still agree
3) This is where we disagree. Last time I'm going to explain it:
FED 3-1-2: If a pitcher is replaced while his team is on defense, the substitute pitcher shall pitch to the batter then at bat or any substitute for that batter until such batter is put out or reaches base or until a third out is made. To ensure that the requirements of this article be fulfilled, the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule.

Read it again:

the umpire will deny any coach-defensive player conference that will violate the rule.[/

The coach makes the change, goes back to dugout, decides he wants to come back out. Umpire should say, "No, coach, you can not come back out for a conference until the pitcher has faced a batter or recorded a third out."

The part you seem to be missing is "THE RULE" -- and "THE RULE" is that a pitcher must face one batter (or have the side retired) before he's replaced.

So, we all agree -- if the conference would require the pitcher to be removed, then the conference should not be allowed.

But, if the conference would NOT require the pitcher to be removed, then the conference is allowed.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Good luck with the rest of the season.

I'm done here. All out of troll food.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 09:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
Two bits, get a clue

The guys talking to you, including me are anything but Trolls. That last post is really discouraging. You are intentionally misreading our posts, then hitting us because you don't like the answer. Man up.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 09:31am
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
Good luck with the rest of the season.

I'm done here. All out of troll food.
I don't understand what you mean by troll. It looked like people here were having a good discussion, then you made that unnecessary comment.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 10:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
TwoBits: This is a rare instance where the written rule also sets forth the purpose (spirit) of the rule: "To ensure that the requirements of this article [3-1-2] be fulfilled..." 3-1-2 is in the "Substituting" section, and requires a substitute pitcher to face one batter (unless he is injured or dumped). It has nothing to do with defining or limiting charged conferences. They are covered in 2-10-1 and 3-4.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
Good luck with the rest of the season.

I'm done here. All out of troll food.
DG, JK and Bob Jenkins are trolls? In Bizarro World, maybe.

Reasonable and knowlegeable people corrected you. Accept it, learn from it and move on; or take your ball and go home. Your choice.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 11:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
I'll respectfully apologize, guys. In my haste to reply, I neglected to read Mr. Jenkins's response clearly. In re-reading Mr. Jenkins's response, it is clear that I was wrong in my interpretation.

As for the troll comment, I was so sure that I was right that others were disputing me just to be disruptive. Sorry guys, my fault, my mistake. Don't hate me for it.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 11:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits View Post
I'll respectfully apologize, guys. In my haste to reply, I neglected to read Mr. Jenkins's response clearly. In re-reading Mr. Jenkins's response, it is clear that I was wrong in my interpretation.

As for the troll comment, I was so sure that I was right that others were disputing me just to be disruptive. Sorry guys, my fault, my mistake. Don't hate me for it.
Good man.

Others were on the same track as Bob, but none were as clear.
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 03, 2009, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
I'm the "rules guy" in my association, the one the other umpires turn to for interpretations. About once a year, I learn something I didn't already know. It may be twice this year as the season is still pretty young!
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 04, 2009, 06:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
I'd like to politely disagree

Quote:
OP: A game I was at, the defense called time, came out and made a pitching change. No charged conference for changing the pitcher.
"The pitching change was not a conference."
Here is another one.
"1. HC has conference with pitcher, and replaces him. No conference charged."

I am missing something here. I read it several times in this thread posted by several very knowledgable individuals. What am I missing?

New inning, new pitcher, no conference. Same inning, conference w/ pitcher and catcher, pitcher replaced w/a new pitcher, conference with pitcher and catcher, resume game. This pitching change is not a conference?
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Sat Apr 04, 2009 at 06:58pm.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 04, 2009, 07:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump View Post
"This pitching change is not a conference?
No, it's not.

Spend some time in the rules book instead of searching for rising fastballs.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charged Conference??? VaCoach Baseball 14 Tue Apr 10, 2007 09:13pm
charged conference Little Jimmy Softball 2 Wed Jul 21, 2004 04:10pm
charged conference or not ? AnitanKS Softball 7 Thu Jun 20, 2002 10:28am
Charged Conference mikeysneed Baseball 5 Tue Apr 30, 2002 09:52am
Charged conference - or - not? ntxblue Softball 5 Sat Mar 23, 2002 01:48am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1