![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Why is there both 8-4-2b and 8-4-2f?
Why does 8-4-2b contain the "on a force, does not slide in a direct line.."? That's already included in the definition of illegal slide. Does the phrase "a runner is never required to slide" mean that "a runner who doesn't slide" is always legal? Why was the case play where R1 is in the basepath but is hit by a throw from F4/6 toward first removed? The case ruled the play legal, but R1 was "less than 1/2 way to second." Is the distance important? I've often found this whole section of the rule confusing -- and we've had these same discussions since the discovery of the interwebs. Still, no clarification from FED. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interference / Force Play Slide | tjones1 | Baseball | 25 | Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:25pm |
| Contact on a Force Play - FED | cshs81 | Baseball | 21 | Fri Jun 01, 2007 07:29am |
| Interference without contact | WestMichBlue | Softball | 18 | Mon Jan 13, 2003 03:57pm |
| Force-slide play or just interference? | Gre144 | Baseball | 1 | Thu Mar 29, 2001 12:31am |
| Force slide play and 2 outs or just interference and umpires judgement | Gre144 | Baseball | 5 | Mon Mar 26, 2001 07:57am |