The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 28, 2008, 11:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
However, this play has always confused me. Contrast with this play: Bases loaded, 2 outs, Home run, the BR passes R1 before R3 touches home - this is a time play and no runs score (even though everyone was awarded home).

Can someone tell me the difference here please?


The difference is declared out versus put out.

the homerun is not an automatic award.

It is a four-base award.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 12:29am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Since it is right there in the rule book, why don't I just post the ruling and make it easy on everybody:

Rule 7.04(b) Comment: A runner forced to advance without liability to be put out may advance past the base to which he is entitled only at his peril. If such a runner, forced to advance, is put out for the third out before a preceding runner, also forced to advance, touches home plate, the run shall score.

Play. Two out, bases full, batter walks but runner from second is overzealous and runs past third base toward home and is tagged out on a throw by the catcher. Even though two are out, the run would score on the theory that the run was forced home by the base on balls and that all the runners needed to do was proceed and touch the next base.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 01:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
I Dunno guys

I'll be nice....I'll be nice....I'll be nice.....

It's not working...so...ah hell never mind
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 07:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Since it is right there in the rule book, why don't I just post the ruling and make it easy on everybody:

Thank you, Steve. Good idea.

Keep in mind that if R3 (before scoring) interfered with F2's throw to third, R3 would be out and his run would not score. Or if an overzealous R1 passed R2 before R3 scored, the run would also not count.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 07:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
First off, I agree the run counts.


However, this play has always confused me. Contrast with this play: Bases loaded, 2 outs, Home run, the BR passes R1 before R3 touches home - this is a time play and no runs score (even though everyone was awarded home).

Can someone tell me the difference here please?
The runs (other than BR who made the third out), do count in FED.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 12:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 543
Similar play that actually happened. Bottom of the 9th, 2 out bases loaded. Batter takes ball four, then takes a few steps towards the dugout thinking the game is over. Home plate umpire tells him "touch first base" so the batter goes and touches first, and the game ends. Could this game have been protested?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 01:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaump6
Similar play that actually happened. Bottom of the 9th, 2 out bases loaded. Batter takes ball four, then takes a few steps towards the dugout thinking the game is over. Home plate umpire tells him "touch first base" so the batter goes and touches first, and the game ends. Could this game have been protested?
HUH? Why make this game any harder than it is? He is entitled to the base he is awarded. If you have to grab him by the ear..he is still gets the award.

griff
__________________
Freemen don't ask permission to bear arms

American by birth...Christian by choice.....

NRA life member
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 01:23pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
You can protest anything you want...you won't win everytime that's for sure...they may even say "hey, you can't protest that..." but you can always ask.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 02:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the base of the mountains
Posts: 377
I think they call that preventative umpiring.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08
You can protest anything you want...you won't win everytime that's for sure...they may even say "hey, you can't protest that..." but you can always ask.
No you can't protest anything you want. Judgement calls come to mind. Fair/foul...ball/strike... etc.

A misapplication of a rule...yes.

griff
__________________
Freemen don't ask permission to bear arms

American by birth...Christian by choice.....

NRA life member
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 03:03pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by griff901c
No you can't protest anything you want. Judgement calls come to mind. Fair/foul...ball/strike... etc.

A misapplication of a rule...yes.

griff
correct...but they can "protest" and as I said above...I would simply say, "you can't protest that"
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 29, 2008, 03:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08
correct...but they can "protest" and as I said above...I would simply say, "you can't protest that"
Tomato.. Tamoto.. I get it..my bad

griff
__________________
Freemen don't ask permission to bear arms

American by birth...Christian by choice.....

NRA life member
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 31, 2008, 12:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
I think the confusion may center around what we consider a 'protest'. To me, that is a formal process where a team asks to have a missapplication of a rule reversed. Some may think that a coach who comes out to discuss a call is 'protesting' , but not in the formal sense.

Now, the thought that someone could protest 'anything they want' really depends on the body that is accepting and ruling on the 'protest'. When I worked in LL, a game I worked was 'protested' because the house rules stated that no inning shall start after 7pm. The visiting team manager protested that I started the bottom of the 6th inning after 7 PM. The protest was upheld, because "I did not accurately determine what the correct time was" (per BOD, I should have checked with both managers to determine the 'correct' time). So the bottom of the 6th was wiped off the books, and the game stood as a tie.

This was one of my last LL games I worked for this particular league.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 31, 2008, 02:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino
When I worked in LL, a game I worked was 'protested' because the house rules stated that no inning shall start after 7pm. The visiting team manager protested that I started the bottom of the 6th inning after 7 PM. The protest was upheld,
Huh? An Inning includes both the top and the botom of the inning. So, unles you started the TOP of the inning after 7:00, the protest should have been disallowed. (Unless, of course, the local rule was "no half-inning shall start...")
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Sun Aug 31, 2008, 05:03pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Huh? An Inning includes both the top and the botom of the inning. So, unles you started the TOP of the inning after 7:00, the protest should have been disallowed. (Unless, of course, the local rule was "no half-inning shall start...")
Perhaps that is why that was one of his last games with that league. I wouldn't put up with such shenanagins either.

Whenever I worked a "no new inning after..." league, I checked my own timepiece in my pocket or that of the official scorekeeper, and if it was close to stopping time I would announce the time so there was no questioning the legality of continuation.

I would never consider consulting with any coaches or managers to determine the correct time. That would be like asking each manager whether the runner was safe or out .
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does the run count? DeputyUICHousto Softball 18 Thu Jun 19, 2008 07:52am
count it or not? elecref Basketball 11 Fri Oct 14, 2005 09:06pm
5 second count rbmartin Basketball 12 Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:34am
Should it count? Ref in PA Basketball 25 Tue Dec 07, 2004 01:19pm
ten second count chas Basketball 8 Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:11am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1