The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 08:56pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
Did anyone just see Drake toss Piniella? Can someone give me an example of a more horse**** ejection at the MLB level? I'm struggling to find one.

For those who didn't see it, Fairchild (at first) said the hitter didn't go on a half-swing, then Piniella comes out a little bit and Fairchild put his hand up and said not to come out. Lou has a few quick words from long distance, goes back towards the dugout, and Drake throws him out while Lou isn't even facing the field or either umpire.

Disclaimer: I'm a Cubs fan.
Yep, I saw it. Completely legit toss in my view. He came out of the dugout a little more than a little bit, and quickly, and stopped only when Fairchild put his hand up and said not to come out (he was already out).

What I don't understand is why Fairchild had to do anything. Drake should have tossed him as soon as he came out of the dugout to argue.

Also don't understand why Drake did not call a strike on the swing, and why Fairchild also thought he did not go. It wasn't close to a checked swing from my view, even before the replay.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 09:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
If he ejected him about 20 seconds earlier I would agree that it was completely legit. I think it was legit in that yes, he argued balls and strikes and had to go, but it was weakly and childishly done while Lou didn't even know about it. He actually tossed him (at least) twice as Lou wasn't even facing him and didn't even know it happened because he was leaving.

He waited too long and then got Lou way too late. Might as well have just waited until the next pitch.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 09:22pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
If he ejected him about 20 seconds earlier I would agree that it was completely legit. I think it was legit in that yes, he argued balls and strikes and had to go, but it was weakly and childishly done while Lou didn't even know about it. He actually tossed him (at least) twice as Lou wasn't even facing him and didn't even know it happened because he was leaving.

He waited too long and then got Lou way too late. Might as well have just waited until the next pitch.
If your definition of a horse**** ejection is he waited 20 seconds too long I agree. If your concern was that it should not have happened at all I disagree. And I expect Lou knew it was going to happen when he came out of the dugout, at least that would be normal response.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 09:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Oh I know it should have happened, and I'm sure Lou was probably thinking the same as he was walking away...then it happened.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 09:46pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Anytime someone is ejected, the ejection is legit. The issue is whether you or I agree with it. Honestly, whether you or I agree with it is not the issue. We were not there and did not hear everything that was said. And if we did our opinion might completely change. I do not know how anyone can say while looking just on TV whether someone should not should not be ejected. Unless we hear everything that was said, we are only speculating.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 10:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Anytime someone is ejected, the ejection is legit.
That makes as much sense as me saying the complete opposite.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 10:22pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
That makes as much sense as me saying the complete opposite.
Is that pretty much what you said, the opposite?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,107
No.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 29, 2008, 11:06pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Yes.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 12:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 465
Send a message via AIM to bobbybanaduck
Quote:
Originally Posted by briancurtin
That makes as much sense as me saying the complete opposite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
The issue is whether you or I agree with it. Honestly, whether you or I agree with it is not the issue.

what?? the issue is either the issue or it isn't the issue. the issue can't possibly be the the issue AND not be the issue, it's not possible. something has to be the issue.
__________________
"To dee chowers!!"
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 01:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck
what?? the issue is either the issue or it isn't the issue. the issue can't possibly be the the issue AND not be the issue, it's not possible. something has to be the issue.
I'd like to take issue with this.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 12:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Fairchild should have tossed him for coming out of the dugout, period.

Drake was cleaning up the mess that Fairchild started. An untimely mess, too, because Lou had his back turned when dumped. It was just bad timing by everyone.

Drake had an off night behind the dish, as I was yelling "WHAT!?" more than a couple times. It happens. The trouble with umpiring is that there's no one on the bench to relieve you in the fifth inning if it's just not your night.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 05:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
I always like seeing "Sweet Lou" getting dumped. In all these years, he hasn't learned that arguing balls & strikes is a quick ticket out. And his language hasn't improved either!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cause for ejection? officialtony Baseball 13 Sat May 07, 2005 04:43pm
Ejection xxssmen Basketball 29 Wed Mar 24, 2004 09:26am
Beyond Ejection Patsfan2431 Football 9 Mon Oct 20, 2003 05:20pm
Ejection Huskerblue Football 10 Wed Sep 24, 2003 01:52pm
1st ejection in a while nyblue20 Baseball 3 Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1