The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2008, 12:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
NCAA Play

This happened in the Friday Texas A&M/Nebraska game: Runner on 1, either 0 or 1 out, pitch ruled a strike 3 to the batter. Runner stealing second and PU ruled batter interference with the catcher on the throw. I did a quick glance of the rules (I work football and hoops) and it appears there are certain situations where the runner is sent back to first and others where he is called out -- especially on a strikeout.

They sent him back to first and the coach filed a protest. I'm wondering when is what they did proper and when should they have called him out? Choppy video feed so I couldn't tell what happened with the batter or where he was.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2008, 06:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
This happened in the Friday Texas A&M/Nebraska game: Runner on 1, either 0 or 1 out, pitch ruled a strike 3 to the batter. Runner stealing second and PU ruled batter interference with the catcher on the throw. I did a quick glance of the rules (I work football and hoops) and it appears there are certain situations where the runner is sent back to first and others where he is called out -- especially on a strikeout.

They sent him back to first and the coach filed a protest. I'm wondering when is what they did proper and when should they have called him out? Choppy video feed so I couldn't tell what happened with the batter or where he was.
I think he wins the protest. That should have been 2.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2008, 07:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 323
Send a message via AIM to aceholleran
Does NCAA allow for "soft interference" by F2--on batter's backswing?

Ace in CT
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 10, 2008, 07:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceholleran
Does NCAA allow for "soft interference" by F2--on batter's backswing?

Ace in CT
Yes. Usually called "weak" or "backswing" interference; of the 3 main codes, only FED lacks this provision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BRD (270)
If a batter's follow-through hits the catcher "as the pitch is caught," it is a strike, the ball is dead, and no runners advance. It is not interference. (6-2d) If the batter's follow-through accidentally hits the catcher "while the catcher is in the act of throwing," it is a strike (but not interference) and the ball is dead unless the catcher's throw retires a runner. (6-2d-2) On a third strike, the ball is dead; the batter is out. (6-2d-1)
From this it seems that if the backswing hits the catcher "while in the act of throwing" R1 either goes back or is out. Interesting wrinkle.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
timing play in NCAA shipwreck Softball 9 Wed May 14, 2008 01:55pm
NCAA Play Texas Aggie Football 23 Mon Oct 10, 2005 06:30pm
NCAA Play JMN Football 3 Wed Mar 31, 2004 02:20am
Saw this play on the other board NCAA Uncle Ernie Football 10 Thu Jan 22, 2004 05:22pm
NCAA Play Uncle Ernie Football 6 Mon Sep 29, 2003 03:20pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1