The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 17, 2008, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufus
First of all, a big thank you to all who participate in this forum. It has proved to be educational as well as entertaining.

Second, had a situation in a game last night. We're defense, there is a runner on 3rd, two out, and our pitcher throws a wild pitch. As the catcher comes up to find/field the ball the PU moves to get out of his way. In the process PU inadvertently kicks the ball away from the catcher.

My assistant coach starts to point this fact out, somewhat loudly, but I remember from some dark recess of my memory that umpire contact with a ball is only interference if it occurs in fair territory and let my assistant coach know that. We play under USSSA and I looked in the rule book and that was the actual rule.

My question isn't so much about the play (stuff happens on the field to both players and officials), but why there isn't allowance for things like an umpire kicking a ball further away? I understand that the rule origin probably came from a pitched ball striking the umpire and ricocheting away, but in this case it was the umpire who initiated contact with the ball, not the other way around.

Thanks in advance.
Basically the umpire is always considered part of the field of play. Bottom line is that the defense erred to start the play by throwing a wild pitch, and there is no need for a rule to "get the defense off the hook" if the umpire accidentally contacts the ball etc.,

Same as if there is a foul pop and in "trying to get out of the way" the PU gets in the way of the F2. That's just part of the game the way it was designed.

Now if PU interferes with a throw or as you stated is contacted by a batted ball, then there is a need for a rule to "make the situation better" since the defense was doing what they should and the contact did affect their ability to make an out etc.,

Might be interesting to look and see if this rule has changed any through the years.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 17, 2008, 09:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
Basically the umpire is always considered part of the field of play.
This is not an accurate statement.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 17, 2008, 10:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
This is not an accurate statement.
True. But often the umpire is part of the field of play, or, as a clinician put it to me recently: "umpires are dirt!"
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Umpire Interference Just Curious Softball 4 Tue May 03, 2005 03:55pm
Runner interference versus umpire interference Jay R Baseball 1 Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
L. It is Umpire Interference When: w_sohl Baseball 12 Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:25pm
SRD - Umpire Interference SamNVa Softball 6 Wed Feb 21, 2001 09:44am
Umpire interference collinb Softball 5 Wed Feb 14, 2001 08:58pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1