|
Mon Feb 25, 2008, 12:13pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes I agree, but it's just another example of FED re-inventing the square wheel. They emphasize that the penalty for going to the mouth while on the rubber is a ball rather than a balk, but, with men on base, going to the mouth while on the rubber will ALWAYS result in a balk (from either pitching position), because it is an arm movement not associated with the pitch.
It's like having Professor Irwin Corey as the rules interpreter, assisted by Norm Crosby. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Test questions, part 3 | ChuckElias | Basketball | 16 | Wed Sep 07, 2005 01:48am |
| Test questions, part 1 | ChuckElias | Basketball | 12 | Fri Sep 02, 2005 05:37am |
| Test Questions-NF | devdog69 | Volleyball | 19 | Wed Aug 24, 2005 01:07pm |
| Test questions | SouthGARef | Football | 10 | Fri Sep 17, 2004 09:50am |
| Questions from the test | devdog69 | Volleyball | 14 | Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:07am |
Threaded Mode
