![]() |
|
|||
|
Jim:
I really feel the issue that none of us can get our hands around is the term:
"Allow access to the base." Without definitions this could mean a fielder could offer 1 inch, six inches, a foot or whatever and qualify as "giving access." If you have a true "trainwreck" ANY contact would be deemed "obstruction" (i.e. the fielder is blocking access through contact) and it would be called. However, the power point presentation clearly states: "if both players are doing their jobs and there is contact, a trainwreck, then obstruction should not be called." While I think it is crystal clear that trainwrecks are still acceptable and not penalized well thought of posters (JJ) feel otherwise. Maybe their will be a clearly defined play when the early season interps come out on the NFHS website. Regards, |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Obstruction question from the NFHS board | BlitzkriegBob | Softball | 26 | Tue Jan 08, 2008 07:21pm |
| NFHS Obstruction Question | SC Ump | Softball | 25 | Thu Feb 02, 2006 04:12pm |
| NFHS Obstruction Mechanics | bossman72 | Baseball | 7 | Thu Jul 28, 2005 08:33am |
| F1 as fielder and the LBR | Dakota | Softball | 8 | Sat Nov 20, 2004 09:28am |
| T/F - A fielder in possession of the ball can never be guilty of obstruction. | Dakota | Softball | 2 | Thu Oct 11, 2001 07:13pm |