verbal obstruction?

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by ozzy6900

No anger at all - as I stated it's been discussed many, many times before.

2007 NCAA
Interference
The act of an offensive player, umpire or nongame person that interferes
with; physically or verbally hinders; confuses; or impedes any fielder
attempting to make a play.

Rule 5-3
Team Offensive Interference

SECTION 3. No offensive team members, either in or out of the lineup,

shall physically or verbally hinder, confuse or impede any defensive player

who is attempting to make a play.

PENALTY—(1) The umpire shall call offensive interference and call out
the runner on whom the play was attempted, or would have
been attempted.

Rule 5-17
Verbal Abuse (Bench Jockeying)
SECTION 17. Game personnel shall not use language that will, in any
manner, refer to or reflect negatively upon opposing players, coaches,

umpires or spectators.

PENALTY—The umpire shall warn the offending individual and the
coach one time. If the verbal abuse continues after the

warning, the offender shall be ejected. If the verbal abuse
continues after the first ejection, the head coach shall be
ejected along with any other offending personnel.

A.R.—An individual ejected for verbal abuse shall not be suspended.


I just get tired of answering the same questions - don't read anything into it.


Sorry Bob, but as you see above, you should not ignore it in NCAA.


FED rules
SECTION 21 INTERFERENCE — OFFENSIVE, UMPIRE, SPECTATOR

ART. 1 ... Offensive interference is an act (physical or verbal) by the team at bat:

a. which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses any fielder
attempting to make a play; or
b. when a runner creates malicious contact with any fielder, with or without
the ball, in or out of the baseline; or

c. a coach physically assists a runner during playing action.

SECTION 22 OBSTRUCTION AND FAKE TAG

ART. 1 ... Obstruction is an act (intentional or unintentional, as well as

physical or verbal) by a fielder, any member of the defensive team or its team personnel that hinders a runner or changes the pattern of play as in 5-1-3 and 8-3-2;
or when a catcher or fielder hinders a batter as in 5-1 -2b, 8-1 -1 e, 8-3-1 c and 8-3-2.

ART. 2. . . A fake tag is an act by a defensive player without the ball that

simulates a tag. A fake tag is considered obstruction.

*** As a side note, in 2007, the FED changed Verbal to both Offensive Interference & Defensive Obstruction. ***

Regards & yes..... the meds kicked in an hour ago!

Ozzy,

Where in this rule 5-3 that you have cited does it address a defensive player hollering something at a base runner? The rule clearly is addressing violations by offensive team members hindering a defensive player. I can see nothing that you cited that refers to a defensive player. Can you clear this up for me? I admit that I'm not any kind of NCAA rules expert, but I tend to agree with Bob J. on this one.

[MD Longhorn]

It should be noted that F4 merely saying these things is nothing until it affects something. If the runner ignores him, you have nothing. If he actually affects the runner, THEN you could have verbal obstruction, depending on ruleset.

[justanotherblue]

So why have base coaches then?? Although I do understand Fed doesn't think the kids can't play baseball and hence has several poorly written rules and penaltys that protect the batter/offense/runner when absouletly no advantage is gained by the defense. The meer act of saying back I don't agree with being obstruction. The case play sited in Fed deals with deception tactics employed, which I do agree with. If junior listens to F4 or
F5 instead of watching F1 and listening to his coaches he deserves to get picked off. I'm with SDS, which case play, which rule that specifically deals with the simple verbage... back.. back? That's what the coaches are for.

[ManInBlue]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

Ozzy,

Where in this rule 5-3 that you have cited does it address a defensive player hollering something at a base runner? The rule clearly is addressing violations by offensive team members hindering a defensive player. I can see nothing that you cited that refers to a defensive player. Can you clear this up for me? I admit that I'm not any kind of NCAA rules expert, but I tend to agree with Bob J. on this one.

What he quoted is basically a definition of INT. That's an offensive violation. OBS is defensive. The fact that it's mentioned to include verbal in INT, I would personally interpret that to include OBS on the defense. Based strictly on what has been posted.

Correct me if that's wrong. I will look into the NCAA rule book this weekend to see if it spells anything out.