Wed Sep 12, 2007, 03:46pm
|
 |
Get away from me, Steve.
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,790
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck
that's what my original thinking was before talking it out last night. his point was that the runner stopped running due to being obstructed and went back to 1B. if e hadn't been obstructed, he would have kept going and there would never have been an opportunity for the int. therefore, at the conclusion of the play, he would have awarded the runner such to make it so that the obstruction was rectified, sending him to 2B. i'm going to send him the video and see what he has to say about it. it may take awhile, but i'll post when he gets back to me.
|
Convoluted reasoning. The ball was live as it was type B obstruction.
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
