The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
Legal or not??

Coach of 10 year old seeking an answer to question.

Runner on 1st

Is RH pitcher allowed to lift front leg up (straight-not toward home) and spin and throw to 2nd - as if he is trying to pick someone off 2nd even though there is only a runner on 1st?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
No, unless R1 is stealing or bluffing AND the umpire judges that the throw is to make a play on the runner.

Otherwise, throwing to 2B would be a balk for throwing to an unoccupied base.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
So if the R1 is stealing - then it would be OK.

At our level - the Runner is going pretty much everytime. This would be a way to help control the running game.

If I have my pitcher raise his leg straght up and hold for a second and the R1 attempts a steal - my pitcher can spin and throw to 2nd (as long as he steps toward 2nd before he throws)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

jhelbling,

Not so fast there!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhelbling
If I have my pitcher raise his leg straght (sic) up and hold for a second ...
If he comes to a complete stop during this move, he will have balked for failing to meet the "..without alteration or interruption..." requirement.

If he does it smoothly and continuously - and the runner is advancing to 2B - he is fine.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhelbling
So if the R1 is stealing - then it would be OK.

At our level - the Runner is going pretty much everytime. This would be a way to help control the running game.

If I have my pitcher raise his leg straght up and hold for a second and the R1 attempts a steal - my pitcher can spin and throw to 2nd (as long as he steps toward 2nd before he throws)
Um... probably not ....

Problem is the "hold for a second..." part. One F1 begins his move to pitch or pick, he must continue without interruption. Now, if SOMETHING on F1 remains "in motion" while the leg hangs up, he is technically OK, but relying on LL-level umps to notice that or make the fine distinction required ... risky at best. Have your pitcher do the move without the "hang" when they start to steal - getting the out is far better than detering the attempted steal.

Edit> As usual, JM got there first!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
Thanks - I understand.

Something to practice. I would not mind giving up a balk if the R1 does not attempt to steal because the % at our level is that they are going to steal. I know we steal EVERY time when on 1st.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 02:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhelbling
Thanks - I understand.

Something to practice. I would not mind giving up a balk if the R1 does not attempt to steal because the % at our level is that they are going to steal. I know we steal EVERY time when on 1st.
I don't get it: R1 steals 2d vs. F1 balks and R1 is awarded 2d... why do you prefer the balk over the steal?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 03:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbfoulds
I don't get it: R1 steals 2d vs. F1 balks and R1 is awarded 2d... why do you prefer the balk over the steal?
Can't get tagged out on the balk.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbfoulds
I don't get it: R1 steals 2d vs. F1 balks and R1 is awarded 2d... why do you prefer the balk over the steal?
Let me take a guess having coached my boys at this age: prefer trying a move and having a shot at picking the runner off if I can get away with it, than having someone steal and my catcher (or fielders) misplay the pitch/throw and let the runner go even further. Or, telling my catcher not to throw to 2nd on any steals (for the same reason) and put negative thoughts/criticisms in his head instead of trying something bold like the pickoff move - a positive thing for the players.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 04:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Can't get tagged out on the balk.
That'd make sense if he was the OC; his comment seemed to be that he'd prefer HIS F1 to be called for the balk, rather than have R1 steal - THAT's what I don't get.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 08:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Maybe it was the foul ball I took of the mask earlier tonight, but what league is allowing pick off plays with 10-year olds?
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
USSSA for one allows leading. I believe 10 year-olds play with a 48 foot mound and 60 foot basepaths. They then slowly graduate them to full field at age 14. (70 foot paths at age 12 I think).

I'm sure some umpires in NC, SC, or GA could fill us in on what the actual distances are.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
If this is Little League (10 yr old kid), then there is no such thing as a balk. I do not have my book handy, but it may meet the definition of an illegal pitch.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 09:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
johnny - I do believe this would be an illegal pitch, as the pitcher is starting and then not coming to the plate. 1 ball penalty. (I wouldn't kill a 10 year old for anything before I had to lock in though).
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 29, 2007, 10:37pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhelbling
At our level - the Runner is going pretty much everytime.
You need a pitchout sign.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal Tag? bwbuddy Baseball 20 Thu Jun 15, 2006 03:13am
Legal? Erik Basketball 22 Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46am
legal or not xxssmen Basketball 25 Sat Mar 13, 2004 02:59am
Is this legal? BoBo Football 6 Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:39am
Can someone tell me if this is legal??? cecilc Lacrosse 2 Fri Jun 27, 2003 11:37pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1