The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 04, 2003, 11:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indianola, Ia
Posts: 319
Watching a replay of state finals here in Iowa and noticed this in one of the games.

Team goes into punt formation.
Punter is 12 yards deep. Personal protector is about five. One up back behind a guard.

Now the questionable part. The other up back is behind the center with his hands under the center for a direct snap. Instead of snapping to the Upback/QB he snaps the ball between the legs of the QB back to the punter. I am assuming they must run a fake off this as well.

Is the player under the center lined up legally or must his hands be away from the center.

Hope this makes sense one of those hard plays to explain almost need to see.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 04, 2003, 11:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
NFHS,
Rule 7-2-3
Of the players of A who are not on their line at the snap only one may penetrate the vertical plane through the waistline of his nearest teammate who is on the line. He must have his hands in position to receive the ball if it s snapped between the snapper's legs but he is not required to recieve the snap. Any other player(s) must be in legal position as a back.

According to your description this is legal.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 05, 2003, 01:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 107
But the center loses his roughing-the-snapper protection...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 05, 2003, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5
Also you have to have five players numbered 50 -79 on the line of scrimmage as this is NOT a scrimmage kick formation.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 08, 2003, 10:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 54
What does that formation (losing scrimmage kick status) do as far as roughing/running into the kicker is concerned. Is this now essentially a quick kick?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 02:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheyenne, wyoming
Posts: 1,493
as far as roughing the kicker goes, formation is not a concern....when you kick, you are protected, there is however a little leeway given if the kicker appears to be a runner for a while then kicks....
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 11:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally posted by hab_in_exile
What does that formation (losing scrimmage kick status) do as far as roughing/running into the kicker is concerned. Is this now essentially a quick kick?
REPLY: The issue on roughing is not for roughing the kicker. He stills retains his right to 'special' protection once he puts his foot to the ball. But the formation definitely affects whether or not protection is afforded the snapper. When the up back lines up with his hands under the snapper, it is not a scrimmage kick formation (see NF 2-14-2). So the snapper is fair game. He's not afforded the special protection outlined in NF 9-4-5
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1