The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 05:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dixie
Posts: 4
That's kinda weird. The grey pants would be cooler then the dark, but maybe they can get them cheaper.
__________________
Baseball Rules!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 05:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Hehehehe

They certainly ARE NOT cheaper. Poly/Wool Blend is more expensive.

In our area of the world we have guys that work both high school and college. Since they do not want to carry extra pants (i.e. buy extra pants) they wear the poly/wool (darker pant) when working with high school only umpires (heather grey).

At the state tournament this year the Executive Director of the OSAA (Oregon School Activities Association) commented that umpires in the same game had different colored slacks.

He wants this to end.

BTW, not all umpires worry about wearing the most inexpensive items.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 06:04pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
They certainly ARE NOT cheaper. Poly/Wool Blend is more expensive.

In our area of the world we have guys that work both high school and college. Since they do not want to carry extra pants (i.e. buy extra pants) they wear the poly/wool (darker pant) when working with high school only umpires (heather grey).

At the state tournament this year the Executive Director of the OSAA (Oregon School Activities Association) commented that umpires in the same game had different colored slacks.

He wants this to end.

BTW, not all umpires worry about wearing the most inexpensive items.

Regards,
So what makes the darker pants the choice for college umpires in your area? I only know a couple guys who wear the darker pants.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 06:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SW Kansas
Posts: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
.

BTW, not all umpires worry about wearing the most inexpensive items.

Regards,
Then there are the umpires who umpire not only because they enjoy it, but to help pay the bills and would rather not buy the "extra" if they don't have to. All I've seen in my area is the heather so I'm not too worried at this point.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 07:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Personally, I find the Davis pants to hide the dirt a bit better and less prone to turning that fading pink/purple hue when left to the sun's rays too long. I also think the so-called "polo blue" shirts go better w/ the darker pants than the lighter ones.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 07:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Ok,

Please refer to the CWS umpires.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 25, 2007, 03:03am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas
Then there are the umpires who umpire not only because they enjoy it, but to help pay the bills and would rather not buy the "extra" if they don't have to.
Let me name the umpires I have known that didn't do it for the need of money. Let me think now, hold on, remembering, oh, two. Yes, I remember two.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 25, 2007, 05:00am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Let me name the umpires I have known that didn't do it for the need of money. Let me think now, hold on, remembering, oh, two. Yes, I remember two.
Better make it 3. I don't do it for the need of money. I take the money as my time's worth something, but I could pack umpiring in tomorrow and not miss the money.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2007, 10:48pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a hut
Posts: 911
Send a message via AIM to fitump56 Send a message via MSN to fitump56 Send a message via Yahoo to fitump56 Send a message via Skype™ to fitump56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
Better make it 3. I don't do it for the need of money. I take the money as my time's worth something, but I could pack umpiring in tomorrow and not miss the money.
One difference. I never take the pay in the first place. That is how I define "umpires who don't work for the money". My times worth giving not something. No begrudgment to anyone who takes pay but if you take it, you spent it which, in order to buy, you needed it.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day."
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 25, 2007, 05:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SW Kansas
Posts: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitump56
Let me name the umpires I have known that didn't do it for the need of money. Let me think now, hold on, remembering, oh, two. Yes, I remember two.
Your simple mind seems to be misfiring. There's no way I'd umpire if I didn't love the game and being on the field. The money is secondary, but happens to come in useful. I would rather work overtime at my first job than take on a 2nd that I didn't enjoy. Baseball is an escape for me; from work, home, and most outside stress. The fact that I get paid for it is a bonus.

Working with a "collect the check" umpire is usually a long day.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 25, 2007, 07:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
Need Info

For those of you who have both pant types, how big a difference is there?

I only wear +POS and Fetchimer, is Honig's pant really that much darker you notice it?

I guess I can buy new stuff, the idea is to be professional, but frankly I'd rather keep with the same stuff. I haven't even bought the newer color shirts recently, mopst of the time my partners only have navy or light blue, so why spend $$$ for shirts you wear once a year if then?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 25, 2007, 07:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkumpire
For those of you who have both pant types, how big a difference is there?

I only wear +POS and Fetchimer, is Honig's pant really that much darker you notice it?

I guess I can buy new stuff, the idea is to be professional, but frankly I'd rather keep with the same stuff. I haven't even bought the newer color shirts recently, mopst of the time my partners only have navy or light blue, so why spend $$$ for shirts you wear once a year if then?
Yes, you can notice the difference when on the field with two umpires who are wearing different colors. For most games, though, no one cares.

Here, the IHSA requires the heather gray, not the darker gray. One college association requires (I think) the darker gray. I agree that they go better with the polo blue and black.

That said, what the "standard" is in OR, or FL, or IL or NY shouldn't matter to the OP -- only the standard in his/her area.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
They certainly ARE NOT cheaper. Poly/Wool Blend is more expensive.

In our area of the world we have guys that work both high school and college. Since they do not want to carry extra pants (i.e. buy extra pants) they wear the poly/wool (darker pant) when working with high school only umpires (heather grey).

At the state tournament this year the Executive Director of the OSAA (Oregon School Activities Association) commented that umpires in the same game had different colored slacks.

He wants this to end.
BTW, not all umpires worry about wearing the most inexpensive items.

Regards,
We are not allowed to wear the new pants when doing FED games. Our association was very adamant about this. They said that the NCAA guys will just have to carry 2 different colors, like it or not.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 09:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dixie
Posts: 4
Well i hadn't thought about them getting dirty like that. I guess the darker color would be better for that reason.
__________________
Baseball Rules!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 09:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
I'm referring to dusty fields. No pants I know will hide the messy, wet mud that just cakes everywhere.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Number Color? Blue37 Baseball 2 Tue May 08, 2007 09:10pm
Different color socks. refnrev Basketball 24 Mon Mar 05, 2007 08:36am
NFL Color Question billkeil Football 10 Tue Aug 31, 2004 04:04pm
Shoe Color LDUB Baseball 10 Thu May 06, 2004 08:59am
Same color uniforms? Nevadaref Basketball 6 Wed Dec 11, 2002 03:47pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1