The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 29, 2006, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 96
Foul ball - runner has to re-touch

With a runner on 1st batter hits a foul ball . Does the runner on 1st have to re-touch first base before the next pitch ?
From what I remember the umpire should not put the ball back in play until the runner has re-touched 1st ....is this correct ?
If it is correct let's say the runner does not re-touch after a foul ball (and the ump signals to play ball) and on the next pitch the batter hits a gapper which scores the runner from first . Is there any way the defensive team can appeal and the runner be called out for not re-touching after a foul ball ?
I am not sure I totally understand the logic behind re-touching 1st but I am not questioning the logic just curious about being able to appeal.....
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 29, 2006, 12:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11
This should tell you everything you need to know...

Tag up on foul ball not caught

There is no appeal for the defense in this sitch...

Last edited by Snorg; Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 12:14pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 30, 2006, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeekendRef
With a runner on 1st batter hits a foul ball . Does the runner on 1st have to re-touch first base before the next pitch ?
From what I remember the umpire should not put the ball back in play until the runner has re-touched 1st ....is this correct ?
If it is correct let's say the runner does not re-touch after a foul ball (and the ump signals to play ball) and on the next pitch the batter hits a gapper which scores the runner from first . Is there any way the defensive team can appeal and the runner be called out for not re-touching after a foul ball ?
I am not sure I totally understand the logic behind re-touching 1st but I am not questioning the logic just curious about being able to appeal.....

Note the absence of a penalty.

The purpose is to get the runners back where they belong before restarting play. Given that runners can lead off, being "close enough" is therefore OK.

The onus is all on the umpires per a strict reading of the rule.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 30, 2006, 03:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeekendRef
I am not sure I totally understand the logic behind re-touching 1st but I am not questioning the logic just curious about being able to appeal.....
The requirement is to prevent (a) the offense from taking an 89' lead before the ball is put in play and having an easy stolen base, and (b) the defense from getting the ball put in play when the runner is 45' away from returning.

As long as bothteams have indicated (by their actions) that the runner is "close enough", put the ball in play; no appeal is allowed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
foul ball and runner does not return to previous bag 32setmsbloriole Baseball 19 Thu Jun 15, 2006 06:39pm
Runner interfering with a foul ball akalsey Baseball 8 Mon Aug 16, 2004 01:04pm
First to touch - Technical foul mick Basketball 14 Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:12am
Runner does not touch plate, enters dugout Bluefoot Softball 15 Fri Aug 29, 2003 03:44pm
runner returning to touch base shipwreck Softball 15 Fri Mar 29, 2002 09:14am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1