The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 12:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19
Davis system

I have been using the Davis system (probably not perfectly) for almost a calendar year. Although I struggle with the top of my zone for some reason, it has cured most of my inconsistencies with the low strike. Recently, I worked with a very experienced umpire. When I asked him for a critique, his first comment was about how solid I was and that I never flinched a bit. He then followed that up with his concern that, since my arms were locked in, that I would sooner or later suffer a broken forearm. Since I have started using the Davis system, I have not been hit on the arm (although I expect to). I have only been nicked on the hand a couple of times. What are the responses of those who promote the Davis system to the concern of the exposed forearm.
Secondly, regarding my issues with the top of the zone. I have been told by two very good umpires to concentrate on getting my eyes down to the top of the zone. Using the Davis system, I really can't get there. Any suggestions, other than using the catcher's head to gauge the top of the zone, etc.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 02:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 477
Send a message via AIM to nickrego
I personally have been hit much less in the arms since switching to the GD two years ago. Don't worry, your arms aren't that locked in. They will give if you get a direct hit, trust me.

The high part of the zone has nothing to do with the Catcher, unless it is a curve ball, which I will talk about in a moment.

Every time a batter steps into the box, you have to determine THAT batter's high side of the zone. It should be an imaginary line, half way between the belt and the top of the shoulders. Most of us use a line between the belt and the armpits, as the book high side is really kind of high to hit and looks like a Ball to the rest of the world. Try to find something on the batter's jersey, logo or button, that is close to the line that you can use.

Now, for those curve balls that come in high, and break down through the zone. If the catcher catches that pitch (unless you have really tall batter) above their chin, call it a ball. I personally feel that is the most difficult high strike to call consistently, unless you use the catch / catcher location. But that is just me.
__________________
Have Great Games !

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 10:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 915
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.T.Hill
I have been using the Davis system (probably not perfectly) for almost a calendar year. Although I struggle with the top of my zone for some reason, it has cured most of my inconsistencies with the low strike. Recently, I worked with a very experienced umpire. When I asked him for a critique, his first comment was about how solid I was and that I never flinched a bit. He then followed that up with his concern that, since my arms were locked in, that I would sooner or later suffer a broken forearm. Since I have started using the Davis system, I have not been hit on the arm (although I expect to). I have only been nicked on the hand a couple of times. What are the responses of those who promote the Davis system to the concern of the exposed forearm.
Secondly, regarding my issues with the top of the zone. I have been told by two very good umpires to concentrate on getting my eyes down to the top of the zone. Using the Davis system, I really can't get there. Any suggestions, other than using the catcher's head to gauge the top of the zone, etc.
Thanks.
I've used JD for a long time. Be sure to keep the elbows tucked in exposing only the "meaty" part of your arm. If you do get hit it will sting and bruise but you won't break any bones. Be sure your fingers are to the side of your knees just leaving your thumbs on your knees. My leg guards allow me to put my thumbs behind them thus protecting them. Never took a hit of any consequence in the hands.

Concerning the high strike narrow your stance for tall batters and widen your stance for short batters. I find that I can get my eyes level to the top of the strike zone. At any rate this works for me.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 10:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
As Gordon, keep your forearms facing the pitcher, and any time you get hit, all that will happen is your arm will bend back towards you. Elbows towards you, forearms out.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 02:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 151
Started using the GD earlier this year and was amazed at how more consistent I am, and my legs feel so much better even after a DH behind the dish.

However, to avoid the potential fouls to the arms (I do 12U thru HS), I drop my arms inside and let my hands hang in front of my crotch just as the pitch is released. My body is already locked from the basic GD, so nothing else moves, and it narrows my body a bit - something necessary when you are
6'2" and 250lbs like me and setting up behind sometimes much smaller catchers!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 03:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19
Thanks

Some great responses for me. I appreciate the help.
O.T.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
Fritz ...................

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz
Started using the GD earlier this year and was amazed at how more consistent I am, and my legs feel so much better even after a DH behind the dish.

However, to avoid the potential fouls to the arms (I do 12U thru HS), I drop my arms inside and let my hands hang in front of my crotch just as the pitch is released. My body is already locked from the basic GD, so nothing else moves, and it narrows my body a bit - something necessary when you are
6'2" and 250lbs like me and setting up behind sometimes much smaller catchers!!
With due respect, your description of your stance is not The Gerry Davis system.
__________________
Doug

"I never called a balk in my life. I didn't understand the rule" - Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Agreed Keyman

Any significant change ba$tardi$es the stance and makes what is being used just a "personal" use stance and not the Davis Stance System.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 05:00pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Yeah, it's a real ba$tard of a stance for sure. I call mine "The Ba$tardized Stance." Hey, I think I'll start a new craze!
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 05:14pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
This has got me really confused here. Is it the GD® Stance? Or is it The Gerry Davis™ System? Or is it the Davis Stance System©?

Picture a G.I. taking a crap in a field latrine. There. That's the stance. Be sure to get your feet wide enough apart and keep your head steady there.

Folks, he didn't patent it, nor did he invent it. I have seen umpires use this same stance long before I saw Davis use it in the '80s.

Sorry, just feeling cynical today.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Golly,

Steve:

I am sorry but I do not remember any umpire setting up as Gerry teaches AND be from 3' to 4' back from the catcher. I'll be the first to call b/s -- no umpires EVER worked this precise stance in MLB.

When referenced at clinics it is billed as : The Gerry Davis Plate System.

I have never seen in print, other than Carl identifying it, as a "System".

Trust me from the clinic I attended Gerry did not use this stance in the 80's as you have stated. His introductions say he started working on it in 2000.

I believe the stance itself is now being used by about 8 MLB umpires if my memory holds correct. (Funny about the same number of guys that wear the HSM) . . . we have about five that use it in Portland and more convert each season (no matter the feeling of pdxblue).

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 06:25pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Yeah, fine whatever. Gerry Davis sure worked an extremely wide, squared up stance, with his hands braced above his knees when I used to watch his games back in the late 80s. It wasn't called the Gerry Davis stance back then. It was probably called the stance that Gerry Davis used.

I'm just having some fun anyway. No harm intended. I just find it a bit humorous how seriously y'all are about it, like it's some kind of cult. You guys continue on bringing your tithes and offerings to the Church of GD.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 06:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Yeah, fine whatever. Gerry Davis sure worked an extremely wide, squared up stance, with his hands braced above his knees when I used to watch his games back in the late 80s. It wasn't called the Gerry Davis stance back then. It was probably called the stance that Gerry Davis used.

I'm just having some fun anyway. No harm intended. I just find it a bit humorous how seriously y'all are about it, like it's some kind of cult. You guys continue on bringing your tithes and offerings to the Church of GD.
Now that's funny. Saying we're taking something too seriously.

Pot, Mr Kettle Black calling.
__________________
Doug

"I never called a balk in my life. I didn't understand the rule" - Ron Luciano
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 06:55pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Oh, come on now. You guys are way past serious, and I'm just kidding around. On the other hand, I may be trying to be serious about something, only to be ridiculed with no humor involved. Big difference. Pot on one end, Kettle way off on the other side.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 01, 2006, 07:14pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
I am sorry but I do not remember any umpire setting up as Gerry teaches AND be from 3' to 4' back from the catcher. I'll be the first to call b/s -- no umpires EVER worked this precise stance in MLB.
Tee, I did not specify MLB umpires in my post. I'd never seen MLB umpires work as wide as Gerry did. I was referring to local umpires who just happened to use that style of stance. I also didn't mean to imply that there was widespread (no pun intended) use of the stance, only a few. Perhaps it wasn't the exact stance taught today, but it was really close. You might even recognize the name of this one guy who has used the stance for many years.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Four Man system 3appleshigh Baseball 7 Tue Jun 13, 2006 08:26pm
4 man system ggk Baseball 7 Sat May 20, 2006 12:33pm
One Man System chiquita Softball 16 Fri Jun 17, 2005 07:10am
More on the GD System nickrego Baseball 20 Sun May 23, 2004 07:48am
Tried the Gerry Davis system today. nickrego Baseball 10 Mon May 17, 2004 09:13am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1