|
|||
Quote:
If you utilize proper use of the eyes you won't miss any "nasty" breaking pitches, foult tips or dropped third strikes for that matter. But first, you must learn proper use of the eyes.
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Quote:
I agree that counting the seconds is ridiculous, but a delayed strike call has always been taught in the clinics and classrooms I have been a part of. It only shows that you are not rushing your call, not that you are "hesitant." Of course now, I never attended any classes taught by Jim Evans, so I can't speak for what he teaches. I don't miss any nasty breaking pitches, foul tips, or dropped third strikes either. I must have proper eye usage.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
Well, I had 2 nasty fair/foul calls lately. Both were in 18U tourney games.
1. R1, RH batter is a little late and loops a liner down the RF line. F3 is just inside the line, and the coach comes up to the line just in foul territory. They're looking down the line and block me out. Ball drops fast - too fast for me to read the problem and adjust to see where it lands. 2. R1, RH batter pulls one to deep left, right into the setting sun. I move down the line, watching F7 run toward the line to make the play. I try to pick up the ball, but can't. Next time I see the ball it's bouncing up. I understand that these are both my fault: I need to get in position somehow to make the call in (1), and I need to pick up the ball in (2). I called both 'foul', but I like the idea of calling it fair when the batter "beats" the pitcher. There was quite a bit of crying in (1), as I guess the ball landed on the line. In (2) only the 3B coach cried, which means either that the ball was foul or that nobody else could see it either!
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
When there is no line where there should be a line, and the home team is not going to put a line in, my standard thing to say is:
"Since there is an imaginary line, you gentlemen are going to imagine that I get every close call on that line right!". That gets a good laugh, but also gets my point across! If you make all the close ones go against the home team, you will see a line by the next game! I don't see any problem with having the PU take ALL fair/foul calls on the lines if there are no lines in the outfield. |
|
|||
Quote:
Also, with good timing - proper use of the eyes - one will not make callst to quickly on the bases and will never have to say, "Out..no...Safe". Again, this will ocurr without any phony hesitation. Propers use of the eyes will provide the correct timing. This not just a "Jim Evans" thing. This is taught at both pro schools. Instead of taking someone else word for proper mechanics, whether it is one of your local "mucky mucks" or anyone on the internet, go get trained first hand. The Evans Desert Classic is not far from you and will make you a better umpire in a week.
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Quote:
I have no problems with timing on the bases either. I don't make "out...no....safe" calls. My "hesitation" is not phony, it come from years and years of fine-tuning my calls. Like I also said, I must have the proper use of my eyes, so as not to have these things happen. I realize that the proper use of one's eyes is extremely important, I had just never heard it directly connected with timing before. Now I have.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
offensive foul, defensive foul or no call? | thereluctantref | Basketball | 2 | Mon Mar 13, 2006 01:12pm |
Not much doubt about this one | dtwsd | Softball | 3 | Fri Aug 05, 2005 02:45am |
To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
Would you call a foul? | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 20 | Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:41pm |
"Benefit of the Doubt"--when is it applicable? | Patrick Szalapski | Baseball | 8 | Mon Jul 30, 2001 02:17pm |