![]() |
|
|||
Re: Re: Why don't we look at the rulebook, gentlemen?
Quote:
I allow a side step in the wind-up, but not a forward step. They are both illegal by the rule book. Simply put, a side step is far too common to call. Several major league pitchers even do it. But a forward step? No way. This motion, in one way, is the pitcher going from the windup to the set during his delivery, and is just so wrong and awkward that I cannot in good conscience allow it. P-Sz |
|
|||
Re: Re: Why don't we look at the rulebook, gentlemen?
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bob jenkins
[B] Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Why don't we look at the rulebook, gentlemen?
Quote:
|
|
|||
Brent and Bob are answering the question with realistic, practical, and survivable answers. Yes, the practice is customary to allow it for those who prefer to adjust their pivot foot in this manner.
As Brent said, it is splitting hairs to call a balk on this no different than it is splitting hairs in Fed to call a balk if the non-pivot foot goes sideways vs. backwards. NOTE: OBR has specific reason why non-pivot foot should not go sideways. OBR allows pickoff move to 1st & 3rd while on rubber in windup position. Stepping sideways is, in fact, a step to a base. This is not a concern in Fed as F1 can only disengage backwards with pivot foot or he can pitch. If you are in question here, your ultimate decision should be based upon whether you feel the action is deceiving to the runner causing the pitcher to gain an advantage. If you look to split this hair, you'll also find many others that can destine you to JV ball. Just my opinion, Steve |
|
|||
<< Is this a legal motion. For example: right handed pitcher. Starts with pivot foot on rubber and non pivot foot behind the rubber. Instead of stepping or transferring his weight back to his non pivot foot he takes a step with his left foot first placing it in front of the rubber slightly followed by placing his pivot foot in front of and against the rubber in the proper position. >>
Coach I am going to guess there was runner(s) on base? If so the High School Federation Rulebook is very clear on that a pitcher who has his free foot entirely behind the backside of the pitchers rubber has no choice but to go home on his first movement. This is a balk ! A mechanical one at that. To me an experienced umpire would see what is happening before the balk actually happens, like maybe in the warm ups before the game starts for each pitcher and (A.) make sure you either tell the pitcher you hope that is a move he does only for warm ups or alert the Coach of the mechanical balk and let him deal with it or (B.) what I do ( and I know I will take heat for this) I will call time when I see this starting to happen and ask for the ball from the pitcher and pretend to inspect the ball and tell the pitcher what he is about to do wrong and correct it before he pitches to the batter. Call it preventive umpiring 101. Now before everyone gets all excited about this... I only do this in the first games of the season, especially if its a new rule in the Federation rulebook. You have to remember that a balk is an action by the pitcher to decieve the runner or gain an advantage. So... what is the call? Has he gained an advantage? Did the runner dive back to the base or is this pitcher poorly coached or instructed at this level? This to me is where you must use your judgement. On the other hand, after the season starts I will call it and know JUST as soon as I do balk the pitcher, expect the coach to come out and then have to explain the rule to the coach so he may instruct the pitcher on how to properly "mount" the rubber with runners on base. I will also tell you all that after I have called time and informed the pitcher what he is about to do is incorrect and then put the ball live. In between innings, I will tell the pitchers coach what his pitcher was doing incorrectly and put him on notice that no more freebies.... get it straightened out before the pitcher returns to the mound. Your mileage may vary ! Ax |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|