But the important part is not that the B-R didn't touch first; that's an easy appeal and nothing unusual. The situation is: B-R never advanced to first. He simply quit running.
Is there a difference between a BR who did not attempt to advance to 1B (such as the injured BR in the orginal J/R play) and a BR who merely did not beat the throw?
If this only applies to the former case this pill may be a little easier to swallow...
Fri Mar 23, 2001, 05:19pm
Hybrid Mode
