|
Thu Oct 21, 2004, 09:23am
|
|||
|
|||
|
You have to divide up the responsibilities so you don't get two umpires making opposite calls. You can't have two people owning the call.
What if Marsh had a really good view and decided that it wasn't interference. You get to the meeting and do a "did so!" - "did not!." What do you do then, arm wrestle for who makes the final call?
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
