![]() |
|
|||
Re: Logic, not evident in Wheaton.
Quote:
Most here reached that conclusion long ago. I recall that when Carl Childress first bumped up against Rut a few years ago he thought Rut was putting us on with his stupidity. Carl was convinced that Rut was deliberately acting stupid and was a troll planted to cause controversy with his outrageously moronic statements. I have visions of T. Alan posing as Rut just to get a craphouse going. (T.Alan had been known to do that from time to time. Ask him about Lolly Tessa Ventors.) Only when Bob Jenkins stepped forward to confirm that Rut was a real "person", did it dawn on us that it was possible for such a large amount of rampant stupidity to exist in one brain. In that regard, McGriffs has surpassed this forum in dealing with Rut. Gary has taken to deleting all Rut posts as well as those of his tormenters. For now, this forum is Rut's only outlet so it will probably get worse. I find this situation most humorous. The board that has been known for allowing everything, has censored Rut. The board that has been known for enforcing decorum, has become Rut's dumping ground for his rantings. As Carl would say, Lah me Peter |
|
|||
Re: Re: Logic, not evident in Wheaton.
Quote:
![]() Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
You know guys this is getting real old, real fast. Why don't you take your arguments and disagreements somewhere else and leave the board to constructive things. Or at least agree to disagree.
Try and make Professionalism more than just a part time job. Thank you. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|