Delayed DeadBall, batter Inf

[BSBAL18]

Couple questions i am throwing into one thread...High SChool baseball rules

Aa) Delayed dead ball situation. Is there a signal an ump should make to inform coaches/players/etc that a delayed dead ball is in effect?

Ab) R1 on first running towards 2nd on a line drive to left field, the 2B hinders his run and he has to slow down and alter his pace, so obstruction on 2B, but there is no play. End of play, R1 safely at 3rd. Since the obstruction happened on the first base side of 2nd, is this a no call? or does the obstruction get tacked on at the end of the play and R1 is awarded one base (home)?

Ba) Count 1-1, runner on first. Batter swings and hits catchers mitt on the followthru. This is batter interference, but the runner was not stealing (no play to interfere with), so this is a no-call, correct?

Bb) Count 1-1, no runner. Batter swings and hits catchers mitt during his swing (NOT the followthru) and this is catchers interference. is that automatic interference call and batter takes first base?

Really looking for catcher INt vs batter INT, and if there is no play out in the field to be had, then no batter interference to be called, but catchers int is automatic dead ball, batter gets awarded first base and any other runners return to base Time of Pitch, unless of course there is a runner on first who will be sent to 2nd since the batter is taking first base.

[rbmartin]

In Fed Baseball, the DDB signal was eliminated (I believe in 2012), but its (the DDB Rule) usage and application remains the same.
Signal remains in Fed Softball.

[MT 73]

Originally Posted by BSBAL18

Couple questions i am throwing into one thread...High SChool baseball rules

Aa) Delayed dead ball situation. Is there a signal an ump should make to inform coaches/players/etc that a delayed dead ball is in effect?

Ab) R1 on first running towards 2nd on a line drive to left field, the 2B hinders his run and he has to slow down and alter his pace, so obstruction on 2B, but there is no play. End of play, R1 safely at 3rd. Since the obstruction happened on the first base side of 2nd, is this a no call? or does the obstruction get tacked on at the end of the play and R1 is awarded one base (home)?

Ba) Count 1-1, runner on first. Batter swings and hits catchers mitt on the followthru. This is batter interference, but the runner was not stealing (no play to interfere with), so this is a no-call, correct?

Bb) Count 1-1, no runner. Batter swings and hits catchers mitt during his swing (NOT the followthru) and this is catchers interference. is that automatic interference call and batter takes first base?

Really looking for catcher INt vs batter INT, and if there is no play out in the field to be had, then no batter interference to be called, but catchers int is automatic dead ball, batter gets awarded first base and any other runners return to base Time of Pitch, unless of course there is a runner on first who will be sent to 2nd since the batter is taking first base.

Aa) There is no standard delayed dead ball sign since every infraction that results in a DD situation has it's own mechanic.
Signal obstruction or interference by pointing at the guilty party and verbalized the proper call of either "That's Obstruction" or "That's Interference!"

Ab) Signal obstruction and wait until all play has ceased. Now you award him any base that will nullify the obstruction, which in this situation I would leave him at 3B.
I would only award him home if I felt that is where he would have safely advanced if the obs had not occurred.
In HS obstruction is always a minimum of a one base award.

Ba) In HS backswing interference is an out and the ball is dead.
In OBR. the ball is dead with no penalty. If it is the 3rd strike batter is out. Any runners who advanced are sent back to the base they occupied at time of pitch.
In regular batters interference the infraction is ignored if catcher throws the runner out.
If not then ball is dead, batter out and runners return.
If it is strike 3 you also call out the runner if you think the catcher had a good chance of putting him out. ( HS only)
In OBR both the batter and runner are called out no matter what.

B.b) HS calls this catchers obstruction and it is a delayed dead ball.
If the batter and all runners advance one base it is ignored.
Otherwise the batter advances to 1B and forced runners advance one base.
However, the offensive coach has the choice of taking the obstruction award or the results of the play.

[rcaverly]

Originally Posted by BSBAL18

Ba) Count 1-1, runner on first. Batter swings and hits catchers mitt on the followthru. This is batter interference, but the runner was not stealing (no play to interfere with), so this is a no-call, correct?

NFHS 2-21-4 . . . Follow-through interference is when the bat hits the catcher after the batter has swung at a pitch and hinders action at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to play on a runner. [Emphasis mine.]

[MT 73]

Originally Posted by rcaverly

NFHS 2-21-4 . . . Follow-through interference is when the bat hits the catcher after the batter has swung at a pitch and hinders action at home plate or the catcher’s attempt to play on a runner. [Emphasis mine.]

Just did some research and I see that in 2015 they change the wording that there is backswing and follow thru interference.
Backswing is interference without a play ( dead ball and strike 3 if it is the 3rd strike) and follow through is backswing interference when the catcher is making a play.
Good grief--why can't everyone just use OBR?
So yes, in Ba just call time and get the ball back to the pitcher--just like in OBR.
Seriously thanks for the heads up .

[rcaverly]

Originally Posted by MT 73

Backswing is interference without a play ( dead ball and strike 3 if it is the 3rd strike) and follow through is backswing interference when the catcher is making a play.

NFHS backswing interference is when B's bat contacts F2 or his equipment (usually the glove) while B and F2 are preparing for the next pitch. Either or both may be guilty of initiating the contact. Nobody is advancing and nobody is attempting to make an out. But, both may be momentarily distracted. Mechanic: Shut it down, reset and start over. It's done the same in games played using OBR.

2015 NFHS Interps SITUATION 8: As the pitcher looks into the catcher for a sign, the batter is moving his bat back and forth across the plate. The batter accidentally contacts the catcher with his bat during this movement. RULING: This is backswing interference. The ball is immediately dead and all players are provided time to regain their positions. (2-21-5, 5-1-1n, 7-3-7 Penalty)

Originally Posted by MT 73

Good grief--why can't everyone just use OBR?

There's no money to be made in that philosophy. And, the rules committee (coaches) agreed that more minutia would help them look superior to the officials on the field. It almost never works out that way.

[MT 73]

Agreed.
So what is the ruling when there is backswing follow through with a runner on base who is not advancing?
Situation-- batter swings and his backswing interferes with F2's return throw to the pitcher?

[john5396]

Originally Posted by MT 73

Agreed.
So what is the ruling when there is backswing follow through with a runner on base who is not advancing?
Situation-- batter swings and his backswing interferes with F2's return throw to the pitcher?

Nothing.

Follow through interference is only interference when F2 has a play to make and is hindered. So if no runner is stealing just ignore it (perhaps a friendly reminder to the batter to control his bat)

[MT 73]

Originally Posted by john5396

Nothing.

Follow through interference is only interference when F2 has a play to make and is hindered. So if no runner is stealing just ignore it (perhaps a friendly reminder to the batter to control his bat)

Gotcha.
Thanks.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by john5396

Nothing.

Follow through interference is only interference when F2 has a play to make and is hindered. So if no runner is stealing just ignore it (perhaps a friendly reminder to the batter to control his bat)

I agree.

Although the cases and interps that I can find either have no runners (where it's obviously nothing) or a stealing runner (where it's obviously something).