![]() |
|
|||
![]()
I completely disagree that there is no advantage gained by having a non-contrasting libero uniform.
If the libero sets the ball in front of the attack line with a very similar color, it may not be immediately noticed by the referees. The purpose of the contrasting uniform is so that it can be immediately recognized with peripheral vision. The referee *IS* the arbiter of this at the match site. The referee may not always be correct. "The NCAA is the final arbiter." Huh? "The NCAA" doesn't make any decisions. People acting on behalf of the NCAA make the decisions. Again, those people are not always correct (as in this case). The definition of contrasting is NOT in the eye of the beholder. The definition is clear...Definition of contrast: Strikingly different. Very simply, royal blue and baby blue are not contrasting. Contrasting Colors: What Are Contrasting Colors? |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NCAA to penalize one timeout per quarter for non-contrasting jersey numbers | JamesBCrazy | Football | 4 | Fri Aug 01, 2014 07:17pm |
Libero | benbret | Volleyball | 2 | Sun Sep 09, 2012 01:49pm |
No Libero? | PaREF | Volleyball | 4 | Mon Apr 06, 2009 03:00pm |
Blood on Uniform - Use DQ'd players uniform? | Jimgolf | Basketball | 1 | Mon Jan 14, 2008 07:19am |
contrasting undershirts | 26 Year Gap | Basketball | 9 | Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:12am |