The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Weird play - curious about rule

Had the following play happen today and I'm curious about the official rule, though it's one I probably won't see again.

Young girls fastpitch. They were playing *without* infield fly rule, which caused the weirdness.

Bases loaded and either 0 or 1 outs. Batter hits a short infield fly towards third. All runners start advancing. Third baseman couldn't get to the fly in time and it dropped.

Runner from third returns to third base after ball hit the ground. Third baseman fields the ball and tags runner from third while runner is standing on third. Third baseman then touches third base.

Should it be a double play at third, since runner is forced to advance on the hit (no infield fly rule in play)?

Can the runner remain on the base "safe" from tag until third baseman either
1) throws home for the force
2) steps on third to force out runner from second and removing the force for runner at third
3) runner from second arrives and two players attempt to occupy the same base
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
With no IFF rule in effect, the runner on 3rd lost the right to the base on the fair batted ball. Even standing on it she no longer has the right to the base and can be tagged out. With the tag and then step on the base, it was a double play. If the fielder had stepped on the base first, the force would have been removed and the runner standing on 3rd would have been safe on the tag. If both players were standing on the base, the runner originally on 3rd lost the right to the base on the hit and could be tagged out, stepping on the base would do nothing as the advancing runner is already there and safe.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 02:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Thank you for the quick and detailed response.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 08:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 600
no infield fly rule ?

Never heard of that. What is the rationale for not having it?
__________________
Keep everything in front of you
and have fun out there !!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
I have run into it in many rec leagues in the 10 age group. For whatever reason they think it is too confusing for the 10 year olds so they dont have an IFF.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County NY
Posts: 698
Send a message via Yahoo to ASA/NYSSOBLUE
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
I have run into it in many rec leagues in the 10 age group. For whatever reason they think it is too confusing for the 10 year olds so they dont have an IFF.
Bah - how many adult players are confused about it?
__________________
www.chvbgsoinc.org
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 28, 2015, 07:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWFLguy View Post
Never heard of that. What is the rationale for not having it?
Because of the reduced chance of a fielder's catching a fly ball. Why give the defense a gift out?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 29, 2015, 03:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Because of the reduced chance of a fielder's catching a fly ball. Why give the defense a gift out?
In games that can go 20-19, you want whatever outs you can get.

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 29, 2015, 07:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 600
Honestly have never heard of any level of play that ignored the infield fly rule. I've been calling softball and baseball since 1957. Makes no sense to eliminate it. In many of my JV games, it can help move a very long half inning. Rita C is correct.
__________________
Keep everything in front of you
and have fun out there !!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 177
At any level, infield fly is not "giving the defense a free out". This play is the perfect example of why they need the IFF. The Infield fly rule exists to prevent the defense from getting the cheap double play. It protects the offense.

If your really concerned that the young kids don't understand, then add a local rule that makes the IFF a dead ball and protect the offense from the cheap DP.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 07, 2015, 11:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWFLguy View Post
Honestly have never heard of any level of play that ignored the infield fly rule. I've been calling softball and baseball since 1957. Makes no sense to eliminate it. In many of my JV games, it can help move a very long half inning. Rita C is correct.
The Travel League I do has the same rule. No IFF for 10U. I had a similar play to the OP earlier this year. The difference, the fielder touched the base then the runner. The defense wanted the DP, and it took a while to explain after the game why they only got one out. This game also had a look back rule violation called that took some explaining after the game as well.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 08, 2015, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWFLguy View Post
Never heard of that. What is the rationale for not having it?
The reason the rule exists is to prevent the defense from intentionally not catching the pop up and turning an easy double play...

At low-level 10U, or younger, there is not a chance the defense could decide not to catch the ball and then turn a double play... in fact, coaching them to fail to catch it on purpose is more likely to result in ZERO outs instead of 1 (or 2). So no need for the IFF at that level.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 08, 2015, 11:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWFLguy View Post
Honestly have never heard of any level of play that ignored the infield fly rule. I've been calling softball and baseball since 1957. Makes no sense to eliminate it. In many of my JV games, it can help move a very long half inning. Rita C is correct.
I think anyone here would agree it's stupid to remove the rule at JV. We are talking MUCH lower level than that.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 08, 2015, 11:40am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
The reason the rule exists is to prevent the defense from intentionally not catching the pop up and turning an easy double play...

At low-level 10U, or younger, there is not a chance the defense could decide not to catch the ball and then turn a double play... in fact, coaching them to fail to catch it on purpose is more likely to result in ZERO outs instead of 1 (or 2). So no need for the IFF at that level.
Sure there is a need. The play in the OP is proof of that.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 08, 2015, 11:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
That doesn't make a lot of sense, to be honest. If they don't use the IFF, and everyone knows they don't use it, the runner staying on 3rd base after the ball wasn't caught is simply a dumb move on her part. She should run. If she had run (and again, going off the assumption that the level of play is such that IFF is not necessary ... again, low level 10U or any level 8U), then it would not be likely this low level defense could throw her out at home and still have time to throw out any other runner.

it was her staying on 3rd that made this DP possible ... just as if she'd stayed on third base on a ground ball to the third baseman.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird play Texref Basketball 13 Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:21pm
Weird Play gruberted Baseball 8 Sat May 24, 2008 08:33am
Weird play GrumpUmp Softball 3 Thu Jul 05, 2007 03:35pm
Weird Play nine01c Baseball 10 Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:08am
Weird Play JamieSlick Basketball 15 Wed Feb 28, 2001 03:54pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1