Lineup Mgt

[MD Longhorn]

Do as we're told. Don't take the sub until they are actually entering the game. Someone said "barring injury" ...

Batting order is 1-9, 1 is up. They have 1 available sub, number 10. Coach says 10 for 2 when he comes up and 10 is in the ODC. 1 hits a double and breaks his leg sliding into 2nd.

If you took 10 as a sub for 2, we're done or playing shorthanded (Depending on the code). If you properly didn't, 10 is not currently in the game, and can go run for 1.

[youngump]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

Do as we're told. Don't take the sub until they are actually entering the game.

I'm pretty sure that this quote is an argument for both positions here. Someone posted the ruling for NCAA that says that a sub can't be entered until they will actually play. I know of no such ruling for ASA or NFHS (which is scant evidence for their lack of existence.) Absent a ruling like the NCAA's, I would assume that projected subs means what it normally means, subs that will only be made in the future.
Suppose that a team is using a DP/Flex. And in the top half of the inning the home coach comes to you and says I want to put in 13 for my Flex and she's now going to bat for the DP. Are you really only taking half that change because the second half doesn't take effect?

[RKBUmp]

What I find interesting is every case play I have come across for projected substitutions always deals with trying to make 2 moves with the same player. Not one of them refers to taking multiple offensive substitutions.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by RKBUmp

What I find interesting is every case play I have come across for projected substitutions always deals with trying to make 2 moves with the same player. Not one of them refers to taking multiple offensive substitutions.

I agree and I believe many are overthinking the whole thing.

It isn't that hard. When the coach gives you a change, that change is effective then. Immediately. Not when they come to bat, go into the field, take a trip to the head, but NOW.

Doesn't make a difference if it is one player or eight, the coach can make whatever changes s/he please, but when they do, those changes are effective immediately. If the coach tries to involve the same player in two changes, you stop them and refuse to take the change. Tell the coach to give you the change when s/he wants it to become effective.

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

I agree and I believe many are overthinking the whole thing.

It isn't that hard. When the coach gives you a change, that change is effective then. Immediately. Not when they come to bat, go into the field, take a trip to the head, but NOW.

Doesn't make a difference if it is one player or eight, the coach can make whatever changes s/he please, but when they do, those changes are effective immediately. If the coach tries to involve the same player in two changes, you stop them and refuse to take the change. Tell the coach to give you the change when s/he wants it to become effective.

ditto

[Tru_in_Blu]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

I agree and I believe many are overthinking the whole thing.

It isn't that hard. When the coach gives you a change, that change is effective then. Immediately. Not when they come to bat, go into the field, take a trip to the head, but NOW.

Doesn't make a difference if it is one player or eight, the coach can make whatever changes s/he please, but when they do, those changes are effective immediately. If the coach tries to involve the same player in two changes, you stop them and refuse to take the change. Tell the coach to give you the change when s/he wants it to become effective.

Logically speaking, I agree with that philosophy. However, I've posed this at both ASA and NFHS clinics and was told in no uncertain terms not to do it that way.

I've mentioned before that I was dinged on an NFHS evaluation for taking a sub for the second batter due up that inning.

I believe that if the coach tells me that Sally is going in for Sue and isn't due up until the 7th batter of the upcoming inning, that that change should be legitimate. But I've been told not to do that.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by Tru_in_Blu

Logically speaking, I agree with that philosophy. However, I've posed this at both ASA and NFHS clinics and was told in no uncertain terms not to do it that way.

I've mentioned before that I was dinged on an NFHS evaluation for taking a sub for the second batter due up that inning.

I believe that if the coach tells me that Sally is going in for Sue and isn't due up until the 7th batter of the upcoming inning, that that change should be legitimate. But I've been told not to do that.

Speaking ASA

I can state with a clear conscience that those clinicians are misinformed or just outright wrong. The coach has the right to make any legal change to their line up at any time. ANY TIME. If a coach wants to put #2 in for #4 in the 6th position in the line up, I don't give a damn if they are due up this inning, next inning or just grounded out to the pitcher, the umpire should enter #2 in the 6th position in the line up. #2 is now in the game and #4 is out. End of story. No more discussion to be had, it is a done deal. And barring the possibility it is an illegal sub, the umpire hasn't the authority to not make the change.

Again, and I don't know how many times I can state this, all changes are effective immediately. The change not allowed is when the coach wants a change to be effective in the future. THAT is a projected change and what is not acceptable in any game I know.

As previously stated, it should not be that difficult to understand

[CecilOne]

I have the feeling that some clinicians are so afraid of sounding like projected subs are ok, that they are over-reacting to the question.

The response above, from highly qualified clinicians and others should be enough to make the substitution process obvious and clear!

[teebob21]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

It isn't that hard. When the coach gives you a change, that change is effective then. Immediately. Not when they come to bat, go into the field, take a trip to the head, but NOW.

Tomorrow, when a coach tells me "17 for 10, in the #2 spot", I am going to have to hold back a huge goofy grin and try not to think about this post.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

I agree and I believe many are overthinking the whole thing.

It isn't that hard. When the coach gives you a change, that change is effective then. Immediately. Not when they come to bat, go into the field, take a trip to the head, but NOW.

Doesn't make a difference if it is one player or eight, the coach can make whatever changes s/he please, but when they do, those changes are effective immediately. If the coach tries to involve the same player in two changes, you stop them and refuse to take the change. Tell the coach to give you the change when s/he wants it to become effective.

You might want to inform your clinicians of this... as they (ASA) have not been teaching it this way.

The funny thing is ... I've seen clinicians say you should take a sub on a batter that is sure to come up this inning (batting 1st, 2nd, 3rd at the beginning of a new half inning, for example) but not one that may or may not bat this inning (4th batter of a fresh inning ... or 2nd batter up with 1 out and a runner on, for example)... yet other clinicians simply say the sub must be the NEXT batter and the next batter only.

But none of the ASA clinics I've attended to have said you should take, as Mike suggests, 8 subs and put them all in right then.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

You might want to inform your clinicians of this... as they (ASA) have not been teaching it this way.

"They" are not my anything

The funny thing is ... I've seen clinicians say you should take a sub on a batter that is sure to come up this inning (batting 1st, 2nd, 3rd at the beginning of a new half inning, for example) but not one that may or may not bat this inning (4th batter of a fresh inning ... or 2nd batter up with 1 out and a runner on, for example)... yet other clinicians simply say the sub must be the NEXT batter and the next batter only.

Just how hard is it for anyone with any experience to understand the coach isn't making a substitution for a batter, pitcher, catcher, etc., but making a substitution for a PLAYER? It cannot be any easier even for the NCAA.

[jmkupka]

1 out, F9 drops a simple fly ball. A furious coach pulls her and puts in a sub. No problem. But if he waits until the 3rd out and the girls come into the dugout before making the switch, PU is going to say he has to wait until F9 is due to bat before accepting the sub?